Laserfiche WebLink
EFFECT OF HABITAT IMPROVEMENT ON ATLANTIC SALMON IN THE REGULATED RIVER <br />SULDALSLAGEN. A. Lillehammer and J.E. Raastad (Zoological Museum, Oslo), <br />H. Kaasa (Statkraft, Oslo) and J.A. Eie (NVE, Oslo), Norway. <br />River Suldalslagen, which holds a population of large-sized Atlantic salmon has been <br />regulated twice for hydropower production. The first regulation occurred in 1968, and <br />the second in 1980. <br />Some of the present problems have been the reduced density of benthic fauna, the reduced <br />growth of young salmon, the low survival of 0+ and an increase in the length of the time <br />used for smoltification. <br />A restoration program has been established which includes stocking of salmon fry in <br />tributary streams and in rearing channels, and experimental studies of increasing <br />benthic fauna by introducing dead organic material to some habitats. <br />Improvements of physical habitat, that also includes control with the water flow, in <br />rearing channels increased the benthic animals many times, and the survival of 1+ salmon <br />was about 30X. Experiments that included adding of 115 g wheat/m~ gave a three-fold <br />increase in benthic fauna compared to a control area. The largest increase in numbers <br />in August-September came in Chironomidae, while benthic crustacea also had a significant <br />increase. Other groups were found in only small numbers at that time. The increase in <br />benthic fauna in expected to increase the survival of young salmon fry. <br />Ecological Responses to River Regulation: Physical, Phytobenthic, <br />Zoobenthic <br />BEACH EROSION STUDIES UNDER DISCRETE CONTROLLED RELEASES: COLORADO RIVER <br />THROUGH GRAND CANYON NATIONAL PARK. Brian L. Cluer, Larry E. Stevens, Grand <br />Canyon National Park/Glen Canyon Environmental Studies; Stanley S. Beus, <br />Charles C. Avery, Northern Arizona University; Muniram Budhu, University of <br />Arizona; Jack C. Schmidt, Middlebury College, Vermont. <br />Sand deposits in the Grand Canyon have been subjected to controlled daily fluctuating <br />discharges since the closure of Glen Canyon Dam in 1963. Rather than the natural annual <br />flows of about 90,000 cfs with several weeks duration, there are currently daily <br />discharge fluctuations of 5,000 to 28,000 cfs as Glen Canyon Dam produces peaking <br />hydropower for the southwestern electrical grid. This daily "tidal" release pattern has <br />created a novel environment in which substrata as well as the Flora and fauna depending <br />on the substrata face new hydraulic conditions. <br />Since 1974, profiles on sandy beaches have been resurveyed annually. The results have <br />been varied, showing degradation and aegradation, and conclusions are mixed about the <br />release patterns and effects on alluvial deposits. High spills in 1983, 1984, and 1985 <br />further complicated the alluvial studies by reshaping the existing sand deposits. <br />Between June, 1990 and July 1991, a series of discharge tests were conducted by the <br />Bureau of Reclamation, providing an extraordinary opportunity to observe and measure <br />downstream dam effects on riparian substratum. Terrestrial and photogrammetric <br />surveying resulted in over 1500 topographic maps and residual isopach maps of 67 sand <br />deposits located throughout the Colorado River in Grand Canyon. Ground water monitoring <br />at chosen sites along the river corridor measured the movement of water within beaches <br />with respect to river release patterns. A modeling effort is underway that will result <br />is a system-wide numerical tool to predict erosion under various discharge regimes. <br />Preliminary analyses indicate that it is possible to determine the effects of short-term <br />test releases on the stability of deposits. Specifically, releases of constant <br />discharge or limited peak discharge with slow ramping rates are the least erosive. <br />Given the newly acquired data base and the model under development, it may be possible <br />to predict the effects of other release patterns on deposit stability, longevity, and <br />evolution of fluvial sediment deposits. <br />3 <br />