Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />t <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> The razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) is an endangered fish native to the Colorado <br /> River drainage of the Southwestern United States. Records of its capture in Canyonlands <br /> National Park have been extremely rare, undoubtedly due to the difficulty of sampling <br /> these remote reaches and possibly due to the rarity of the species. To our knowledge, no <br /> wild razorbacks have been captured in the past decade (Tom Chart, UDNR, personal <br /> communique) and only a few fish were taken prior to that period. Hinckley et al. (1991) <br />~; reported uncovering reports of only five razorback suckers being taken from Cataract <br /> Canyon and all were adults (Persons et al. 1982, Valdez et al. 1982, Valdez 1988). <br /> Holden conducted fish surveys within Canyonlands National Park between 1967- 1972 <br /> and reported razorback suckers were rare and juveniles absent (Holden 1973). Eight <br /> juveniles were reported captured between Moab and Dead Horse Point prior to Holden's <br /> effort in 1962-64 (Taba et al. 1965). By all accounts, it appears adults and especially <br />juvenile razorback suckers have become extremely rare in the park during the past 4 <br /> decades. <br /> F <br /> ew extant populations of razorback sucker remain. Those remaining aze scattered, <br /> comprised by very few fish (Tyus and Karp 1990) which experience low or no <br /> recruitment (Hinckley 1983). The largest population occurs in Lake Mojave, <br />'~ Arizona/Nevada, with a small population in Lake Mead's Las Vegas Cove, and <br /> occasional collections downstream from Lake Mojave in the Lower Colorado River and <br /> its associated canal system (Hinckley 1983, Marsh and Hinckley 1989). The largest <br /> remaining population of riverine razorback sucker occurs on the Green River between the <br /> Yampa and Duchesne Rivers of Northeastern Utah (Tyus 1987, Tyus and Karp 1990). <br /> Very few naturally-spawned juvenile razorback suckers have been collected in the <br /> Colorado River drainage in recent history (but see Gutermuth et al. 1994, Marsh and <br /> <br />~; Hinckley 1989, Modde 1996, Modde et al. 1996), despite adult suckers being collected, <br />albeit very rarely. Recently fisheries biologists in Utah, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, <br /> and Arizona have begun razorback sucker stocking programs to compensate for the <br /> razorback sucker's low rate of recruitment (Burdick and Bonar 1997, Langhorst 1989, <br /> Pfeifer and Burdick 1998, Ryden and Pfeifer 1995). <br />Historical efforts to enhance the dwindling populations of razorback suckers in the lower <br />Colorado River (Langhorst 1989, Marsh and Hinckley 1989) by stocking hatchery-reared <br />larvae and small fish appeared to have failed (Hinckley et al. 1991). In 1986, more than <br />1.4 million larvae were stocked into the Colorado River from Topock Gorge (just <br />downstream from Davis Dam) to neaz Yuma. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />(USFWS) was able to capture only 41 juvenile razorback suckers from the original 1.4 <br />million larvae (Mazsh and Hinckley 1989). Although the return seemed small, Hinckley <br />(1995) pointed out that between 1981 and 1989 ~15 million razorback sucker larvae were <br />stocked in the lower Colorado River, and if only 0.1 % survived, then we should have <br />~, only expected to encounter slightly less than one fish per surface hectare of water. <br />1 <br />t <br />