My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7887
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7887
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:55:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7887
Author
Fischer, H., (Wendy E. Hudson, ed.).
Title
Building Economic Incentives Into The Endangered Species Act, Third Edition.
USFW Year
1994.
USFW - Doc Type
Washington, D.C.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Transaction Costs: Several transaction costs need to be considered to develop <br />further the idea for federal property tax credits: <br />~gecies Location. Ground locations for endangered and threatened species <br />habitat is generally imprecise and incomplete. Biological surveys would <br />be needed in most instances to establish and delineate such habitats. <br />Locational information for candidate species is even less available. As yet, <br />there is no working definition of "significant habitat supporting biological <br />diversity." A system for defining and prioritizing lands must be developed <br />before keylands supporting biodiversity could be made eligible for thetax <br />credit program.3 <br />Acreag~Quantification and Delineation. Land surveys to quantify <br />and delineate eligible acreage would be needed. <br />Management Plan Development. Plans would have to be developed by a <br />qualified biologist or land planner. Staff and field time by FWS personnel <br />would be required. <br />Compliance Monitoring. Periodic monitoring would be needed to ensure <br />compliance with the plans' provisions. <br />Research Questions and Issues: The key research questions are determining the <br />amount of acreage eligible for such a credit program, and determining the effec- <br />tiveness of this level of tax credit. Another key research question is determining <br />the funding levels needed to enact such a credit program. Data needed to establish <br />the tax credit levels include: <br />• Amount of privately held acreage supporting endangered species <br />habitat. <br />• Number of private land owners holding title to land supporting endan- <br />gered species habitat. <br />• Amount of local and state property taxes paid on private land support- <br />ing endangered species habitat. <br />• Tax rates on private lands supporting endangered species habitat. <br />Prouosal 2 -Tax Credits for Habitat and Improvement <br />Description: Federal tax credits would be allowed for all expenses incurred in <br />improving degraded habitat, or creating new habitat, for endangered, threatened, <br />3 A positive benefit from the tax credit program would be the data generated on species location <br />and habitat types on private lands. As noted, such data are generally incomplete and imprecise. <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.