My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9548
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9548
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:52:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9548
Author
Finney, S.
Title
Adult and Juvenile Humpback Chub Monitoring for the Yampa River Population, 2003-2004.
USFW Year
2006.
USFW - Doc Type
133,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
adult fish composition in 2004, all concurrent with a decline in native species <br />composition of 84.3% in 1997 to 45.4% in 2004 (Modde et al. 2006) <br />The Yampa population of humpback chub has declined dramatically in recent <br />decades. Tyus (1998) indicated much higher abundance and distribution of humpback <br />chub in Yampa Canyon in the 1940's than those reported by Karp and Tyus (1990) <br />between 1987-1989. The 1998-2000 population estimate by Haines and Modde (2002) <br />reported further declines in catch rates. Of note however, is the fact that the Karp and <br />Tyus (1990) and Haines and Modde (2002) sampling was done following wet years in the <br />Yampa River Basin as opposed to the current study. In 2003-2004 catch rates have <br />declined from those reported from 1998-2000 and the population appears near <br />extirpation. <br />Juvenile Fish <br />Sampling for juvenile chubs with seines is an effective technique for capturing <br />Gila spp. and monitoring juvenile success (Chart and Lentsch 1999). Identification of <br />this life stage is the major drawback to these monitoring techniques due to a lack of <br />character distinction in the population (Snyder et al. 2006). Sampling juvenile Gila spp. <br />in more individual sample years is an alternative to the current approach. Annual <br />sampling of juvenile Gila spp would facilitate better monitoring of abundance and <br />distribution. <br />The presence of juvenile Gila spp. indicates some reproduction is occurring. The <br />high incidence of these juvenile Gila spp. in given areas may lend some clues into <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.