My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9548
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9548
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:52:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9548
Author
Finney, S.
Title
Adult and Juvenile Humpback Chub Monitoring for the Yampa River Population, 2003-2004.
USFW Year
2006.
USFW - Doc Type
133,
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Juvenile Sampling <br />Juvenile chubs were collected in both Yampa Canyon and Island Park using <br />seines (7.6 m x 1.5 m; 0.5 cm mesh) and pulsed DC backpack electrofishing in side <br />channels, isolated pools, main channels, and backwaters (see Appendix). Juvenile <br />sampling was conducted in September and October. All juvenile fish captured during the <br />seining efforts were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and later transferred to 70% ethanol <br />(Kelsch and Shields 1996). <br />Humpback Chub Identification <br />Adult chubs were identified using characteristics described in Douglas et al. <br />(1989) and Muth (1990). Characters used for field identification were anal fin ray counts, <br />Caudle peduncle width and depth, angle of the anal fin in relation to the caudal fin, fin <br />shape, head shape, presence of a nuchal hump, and mouth position. Juvenile chubs were <br />identified under a dissecting microscope using similar characteristics as adults though the <br />presence of a nuchal hump was never considered. Darrel Snyder and Kevin Bestgen <br />(Colorado State University, Larval Fish Laboratory) assisted with verification of juvenile <br />samples. <br />Data Analysis <br />Due to the few humpback chub collected, robust data analyses were not possible. <br />Total catch per effort was calculated by comparing electrofishing time, trammel netting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.