My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9576
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9576
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:50:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9576
Author
Utah Department of Natural Resources.
Title
Conservation and Management Plan for Three Fish Species in Utah - Adressing needs for Roundtail Chub (Gila robusta), Bluehead Sucker (Catostomus discobolus), and Flannelmouth Sucker (Catostomus latipinnis).
USFW Year
2006.
USFW - Doc Type
Salt Lake City, UT.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 52 <br /> <br />Progress toward achieving the overall goal will be used to evaluate effectiveness -have we <br />established or maintained the designated number of populations in each management unit? If one <br />population is lost, the Team can choose to re-establish this population using a nearest neighbor ~ <br />population, any genetically appropriate population, or a highly robust and healthy population <br />either in the same location or in a different stream within the unit or state. We are currently <br />considering the need for a hatchery or grow-out facilities only for bluehead sucker in the <br />Bonneville Basin; however, three species cooperators may eventually decide these options are a <br />necessity for all three species. In any event, hatchery fish will also be adequate to restore a . <br />population as long as appropriate hatchery management plans have been developed. We will <br />consider our efforts successful if the designated number of populations are reached and persist <br />through the life of the Agreement. <br />In addition to the number of populations in a management unit we must also identify the <br />adequate population size within each unit to help determine if we are successful. For each ~ <br />species, the Team will attempt to determine the number of individuals required per population to <br />maintain the population in perpetuity. Because we have limited life history and historical <br />information on these species, we must leave this criterion for later refinement. We will use <br />historical and newly collected data to further refine population criteria. These values will be <br />assigned by year five of the Agreement (2009). ~ <br />If we find that it is too difficult or expensive to effectively evaluate the number of individuals per <br />population statewide, we will instead use population trends or relative abundance over the course <br />of the Agreement to determine whether we are successful in meeting this criteria. Because it will <br />likely be difficult to maintain up-to-date information on all streams statewide, we will not require ~ <br />recent information on all streams at the end of the Agreement. Instead we will evaluate the <br />observed situation from 2009 - 2014 (the last five years of the Agreement), compile that with the <br />information obtained through baseline surveys in 2003 through 2009, and use all of this <br />information to make a determination. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.