My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9576
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9576
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:50:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9576
Author
Utah Department of Natural Resources.
Title
Conservation and Management Plan for Three Fish Species in Utah - Adressing needs for Roundtail Chub (Gila robusta), Bluehead Sucker (Catostomus discobolus), and Flannelmouth Sucker (Catostomus latipinnis).
USFW Year
2006.
USFW - Doc Type
Salt Lake City, UT.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PART 3: CONSERVATION APPROACH <br />~ Management Units <br />Page 43 <br />For the purposes of three species management, Utah state waters will be grouped into <br />management units based upon U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) four-digit Hydrologic Cataloging <br />Unit numbers as opposed to the Division's Regional dividing system that is based on political <br />~ divisions and not watershed divisions (see Figure 3-1), as management units organized by <br />hydrologic units are more appropriate for describing populations and metapopulations of the <br />three species. The USGS's Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) system identifies river basins with a <br />series of hierarchical numbers. Smaller watersheds receive longer codes. For example, the entire <br />upper Colorado River Basin is HUC 14. The San Rafael River is in the four-digit HUC code <br />. 1406 and its tributaries of Ferron, Huntington, and Cottonwood creeks are located within the <br />eight-digit HUC code 14060009 (see Figure 3-1). <br />Using the USGS's method, roundtail chub is found within portions of HUC codes 1403 (the <br />Colorado River above the confluence with the Green River), 1404 (the upper Green River), 1406 <br />(the middle Green River and its tributaries such as the Price, San Rafael, and Duchesne rivers), <br />~ 1407 (the lower Colorado River at Lake Powell and its tributaries of the Escalante and Dirty <br />Devil rivers), and 1408 (the San Juan River and its tributaries). Flannelmouth sucker are found in <br />each of these HUCs in addition to 1501 (the Virgin River system), part of the lower Colorado <br />River Basin. The bluehead sucker is also found within the aforementioned 14 codes, but not <br />within 1501. They are, however, found in HUCs 1601 (the Bear River) and 1602 (the Weber <br />~ River) in the Bonneville Basin. The database maintained by the Utah Natural Heritage Program <br />includes occurrences of bluehead sucker in the Virgin River system, but this is inconsistent with <br />other published authors (e.g., Holden and Minckley 1980; Morvilius and Fridell 2004). The <br />closely related desert sucker (Catostomus clarki) does occur in the Virgin River drainage. <br />~ For the purposes of this management plan, flannelmouth sucker in the lower Virgin River (HUC <br />1501) are considered lower basin populations. Bluehead sucker located in the Snake and <br />Bonneville drainages (HUCs 1704, 1602, and 1601, respectively) are considered separate from <br />one another and from Colorado Basin bluehead sucker populations, though genetic distinctness <br />has yet to be proven. The remaining management units are located within the upper Colorado <br />~ River Basin; however, for purposes of managing these populations, San Juan River populations <br />will be considered distinct from populations outside of the 1408 HUC; populations within HUC <br />1407 will be considered distinct from those found in 1406 and others further north, and so on. <br />White River populations are currently considered distinct (HUC 1405); however, they may be <br />added to another population segment at a later date. In fact, each of the populations in these <br />geographically divided management units may be found to be closely related to or even identical <br />to a population in another management unit through genetic analyses. Potentially, however, the <br />inverse may also occur: each stream segment analyzed through genetic work may be a localized <br />and distinct population. If or when this occurs, the Team will discuss whether to continue with <br />the current management units or to create new ones based on the updated information. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.