My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9576
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
9576
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:36 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:50:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9576
Author
Utah Department of Natural Resources.
Title
Conservation and Management Plan for Three Fish Species in Utah - Adressing needs for Roundtail Chub (Gila robusta), Bluehead Sucker (Catostomus discobolus), and Flannelmouth Sucker (Catostomus latipinnis).
USFW Year
2006.
USFW - Doc Type
Salt Lake City, UT.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />FLANNELMOUTH SUCKER <br />Page 37 <br />~ Flannelmouth sucker reside in mainstem and tributary streams. Elements of flannelmouth sucker <br />habitat include 0.9 to 6.1 m deep murky pools with little to no vegetation and deep runs and <br />riffles (Bezzerides and Bestgen 2002, McAda 1977, Sigler and Sigler 1996). Preferred substrates <br />consist of gravel, rock, sand, or mud (McAda 1977, Sigler and Sigler 1996). Flannelmouth <br />sucker partition habitat use by life stage, with young fish occupying quiet, shallow riffles and <br />~ near-shore eddies, and adults occupying deep riffles and runs. Flannelmouth sucker do not <br />prosper in impoundments (Bezzerides and Bestgen 2002, McAda 1977, Sigler and Sigler 1996), <br />though one introduction during the 1970's in Lake Havasu in the lower Colorado River Basin <br />continues to persist (Mueller and Wydoski 2003}. Flannelmouth sucker are opportunistic, benthic <br />omnivores consuming algae, detritus, plant debris, and aquatic invertebrates (Bezzerides and <br />~ Bestgen 2002, McAda 1977, Osmundson 1999, Sigler and Sigler 1996). Food consumed depends <br />on availability, age class, and time of season (McAda 1977, Sigler and Sigler 1996). <br />Flannelmouth sucker mature at four or five years of age; males mature earliest (McAda 1977, <br />Sigler and Sigler 1996). Females ripen at water temperatures of 10°C, whereas males ripen <br />earlier in the spring (6.1 to 6.7°C) and remain fertile for a longer period of time (McAda 1977, <br />Sigler and Sigler 1996). Seasonal migrations are made in the spring to suitable spawning habitat <br />r (Sigler and Sigler 1996, Suttkus and Clemmer 1979). McKinney et al. (1999; see also Bergersen <br />1992, Chart 1987, Chart and Bergersen 1987) documented long-range movements (ca. 98-231 <br />km) among adult and sub-adult fish, although the roles these movements (and obstructions to <br />such, i.e., dams) play in the life history of the fish are unclear. Many researchers suspect that <br />flannelmouth sucker return to natal tributaries for the purpose of spawning (Snyder and Muth <br />~ 1990; Weiss et al. 1998). Populations spawn for two to five weeks over gravel substrates. A <br />female will produce 9,000 to 23,000 adhesive, demersal eggs. After fertilization, the eggs sink to <br />the bottom of the stream and attach to substrate or drift between crevices (Sigler and Sigler <br />1996). <br />Flannelmouth Sucker Status Review <br />General <br />Historical literature suggests that flannelmouth sucker were common to all parts of the Colorado <br />~ River Basin up to the 1960's (Jordan and Evermann 1902, Minckley 1973, Sigler and Miller <br />1963). They have been greatly reduced in the lower Colorado River Basin, but are still <br />widespread in the upper basin (Bezzerides and Bestgen 2002). They are thought to remain in at <br />least 50% of their historical range above Glen Canyon Dam (Bezzerides and Bestgen 2002). <br />There are extant populations in the mainstem Colorado and in tributaries in the Grand Canyon <br />reach and in the Virgin River in Utah, Arizona, and Nevada (see Figure 2-8). Of the historical <br />~ flannehnouth sucker sites in Utah, the species has only been extirpated from sites near Flaming <br />Gorge Dam (Vanicek et al. 1970). Flannelmouth sucker continue to be documented at all other <br />sites. Hybridization with nonnative white sucker is thought to be an increasing threat. White <br />sucker are commonly seen in the Green River and have been seen occasionally in smaller <br />tributaries of the Green and Colorado rivers. As the range of the white sucker increases, it is <br />r thought that the range of the flannelmouth sucker will decrease, as hybridization between the two <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.