Laserfiche WebLink
Page 10 ~ <br />Implementation Program (Program), the Virgin River Recovery Program (VRRP) and the San <br />Juan Basin Recovery Implementation Program (SJRIP) provide funding for nonnative removal <br />from mainstem habitats. The Program has funded mark-recapture efforts for flannelmouth .and ~ <br />bluehead sucker and development of flow recommendations for tributaries to the Green River <br />such as the Duchesne and Price rivers. The VRRP provides protection for flannelmouth sucker <br />throughout the Virgin River system; however, this extensive protection is unusual and partially a <br />result of the ranges of the endangered species targeted by this program. Instream flow acquisition <br />and the idea of experimental flows to benefit endangered fishes is usually a provision of recovery ~ <br />programs; however, emphasis on provision of minimum flows in mainchannel and larger <br />tributary environments for the benefit of endangered fish could lead to greater use of tributary <br />waters in the future to make up for reductions in mainstem diversions, thus potentially <br />jeopardizing persistence of the three species. Additional endangered species recovery programs <br />throughout the range of the three species are implementing activities that will likely indirectly , <br />benefit the three species; please reference the state plans of Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New <br />Mexico, and Wyoming for this information. <br />Benefits of the three species project <br />Conservation of the three species will likely require habitat protection, water acquisition, and <br />management of nonnative fish communities. Together, these conservation actions will also ~ <br />benefit the general public as a whole as conservation is directed towards maintenance of <br />functionally healthy riparian ecosystems and prevention of listing under the Endangered Species <br />Act. Fischer et al. (2000) cite multiple beneficial ecosystem functions resulting from healthy, <br />functional riparian areas, including improved water quality, erosion control, and reduced flood <br />peaks (O'Laughlin and Belt 1995), all of which have been shown to provide substantial benefits ~ <br />to human populations. Additionally, keeping regulatory authority in the hands of state, county, <br />and local governments through the prevention of federal listing will ensure that conservation <br />efforts can proceed more fluidly without economic hardship or conflict that may accompany <br />regulatory protection of species. Voluntary cooperation between stakeholders and managers is <br />thought to be more likely to occur in this atmosphere than in the more restrictive scenario ~ <br />engendered by listing. <br />Certainty of Implementation: Staffing, Authority, and Funding <br />Pursuant to the federal Policy for Evaluation of Conservation Efforts (PECE) guidelines, the ~ <br />Division acknowledges the need to demonstrate a degree of certainty that this Plan will be <br />implemented and will be effective in preventing the need for listing the three species. <br />Staffing <br />Personnel from the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources' (Division) Native Aquatics Program <br />will implement aspects of this Plan. Within the Division, three full time employees are tasked ~ <br />with various types of administrative three species tasks such as procuring funding, planning <br />conservation activities in coordination with regional offices, completing conservation documents <br />and proposals with input from regional offices, and performing other administrative duties <br />necessary to implement the Plan. Regional and Division field offices are located in St. George, <br />Moab, Ogden, Price, and Vernal. These offices include at least one and as many as three full ~ <br />r <br />