My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8196
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
8196
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:33 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:50:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8196
Author
Center for Public-Private Sector Cooperation and G. S. o. P. Affairs.
Title
Recovery Implementation Program for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River Basin.
USFW Year
1993.
USFW - Doc Type
Denver.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Variability in Instream Flow Right Definitions. How can an instream <br />flow right that varies annually and instantaneously be described, quantified, and <br />acquired under state law? <br />RIP and Other Fishery Needs. How should the CWCB accommodate other <br />fishery needs (e.g., sports fisheries) with RIP requirements? <br />3.2.2.4. Category IV (~~Non-Issues"). <br />Compact Delivery Obligation on the Yampa River .Does this obligation <br />prohibit dedication of the senior Juniper water rights to instream flow protection? <br />Orchard Mesa Chec1G Does the operation of Orchard Mesa check present an <br />impediment to the protection of instream flows for the benefit of the fish? <br />3.2.3. Narrowing the Focus for Subsequent Action. Once this important <br />categorization task had been completed, the group recognized that on the one hand it had defined <br />an action agenda that it would obviously take several years to complete; but that on the other, if the <br />forwazd momentum in collaborative problem solving that had been established by the above <br />process was to be maintained, it would be necessary to begin to take concrete steps toward the <br />resolution of at least some of the high priority issues. Accordingly, the group determined that it <br />would next (1) derive anagreed-upon process for addressing Colorado River Compact issues (as <br />noted above) and (2) recommend water acquisition strategies on ariver-specific basis for the <br />provision of interim and long-term instream flows for endangered fish habitat protection. <br />3-7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.