My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7906
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7906
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:31 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:49:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7906
Author
Upper Colorado River Basin Instream Flow Team.
Title
Green River, Determination of Flow Needs Using the Physical Habitat Simulation System (PHABSIM) in the Green River, Utah - Draft.
USFW Year
1988.
USFW - Doc Type
\
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
To verify these conclusions obtained from the SI curves the optimum <br />depths and velocities are compared to the mean microhabitat values <br />reported in Tyus, Jones and Trinca (1987; Table 4). According to these <br />authors, adult Colorado squawfish occupy a variety of habitats with mean <br />depths and velocities of 1.Sm (5.9 ft) and 0.25 m/s (0.82 f/s), <br />respectively. They are found predominately in eddies and runs along <br />shorelines, over sand and silt substrates. In comparison the SI curve <br />suggests an optimum velocity of 0.00 f/s, which is slightly lower than <br />that observed. The breeding adults deposit and fertilize eggs on cobble <br />bars with mean depths and velocities around 3.09 ft and 1.58 f/s (Tyus et. <br />al 1987). This is slightly deeper and slower than the optimum previously <br />stated. The razorback sucker uses main channel habitat in depths ranging <br />from 0.6 to 3.4 m (1.97 to 11.16 ft) and are most common in runs near <br />shore in spring, and on mainchannel sand bars composed of unconsolidated <br />coarse sand in summer. Water depths on the sand bars were usually less <br />than 2 m (6.56 ft) with an average water velocity of 0.5 m/s (1.64 f/s). <br />In general these habitat descriptions coincide with the depth/velocity <br />ratings represented by the SI curves for razorback suckers. <br />According to Bovee (1982), when field observations do not verify the <br />conclusions of the SI curves in question, it is customary to modify the <br />curves to reflect the habitat selection. Thus for comparison the SI <br />curves were adjusted to include the mean depths and velocities observed by <br />Tyus, Jones and Trinca. It is assumed that the means observed represent <br />optimum habitat, and therefore, they have been assigned a rating of one. <br />It is likewise assumed that as long as a minimum depth is maintained, <br />depth will not influence habitat selection. Morelikely a species will <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.