Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2.1 Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program <br />The final guiding document of the Recovery Implementation Program for Endangered Fishes in <br />the Upper Colorado River Basin (Recovery Implementation Program) was completed on <br />September 29, 1987. The Recovery Implementation Program was initiated under a Cooperative <br />Agreement signed by the Secretary of the Interior in 1988, as a coordinated effort of State and <br />Federal agencies, water users, energy distributors, and environmental groups to recover the four <br />endangered fishes in the upper basin (U.S. Department of the Interior 1987; Wydoski and Hamill <br />1991; Evans 1993). The Recovery Implementation Program is now known as the Upper. <br />Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery Program (UCRRP). The UCRRP consists of seven <br />program elements, including instream flow protection; habitat restoration; reduction of nonnative <br />fish and sportfish impacts; propagation and genetics management; research, monitoring, and data <br />management; information and education; and program management. Reduction of nonnative fish <br />and sportfish impacts is referred to in the UCRRP's RIPRAP as "Reduce Negative Impacts of <br />Nonnative Fishes and Sportfish Management Activities (Nonnative and Sport Fish <br />Management)". <br />Tasks that describe projects and activities under each program element are identified in the <br />RIPRAP. Many of the identified tasks are recommendations of the Nonnative Fish Control <br />Strategy (Tyus and Saunders-1996) developed as a result of a workshop held in September 1996. <br />The RIPRAP provides annual guidance on all recovery activities and identifies the nonnative fish <br />control and removal programs and the responsible entity. Twenty-five tasks are currently <br />identified in the RIPRAP under the recovery program element Nonnative and Sport Fish <br />Management. Many of these tasks involve direct removal or translocation of nonnative fishes <br />from the rivers of the upper basin. However, since nonnative fish removal was developed and <br />implemented in the upper basin, there has not been an effective, precise, and reliable way <br />developed to measure success. The amount of effort expended necessary to detect a response has <br />also not been determined. <br />The current focus of the UCRRP with respect to Nonnative and Sport Fish Management is to: <br />• confine nonnative stockings to areas where an absence of conflicts with <br />endangered fishes can be demonstrated; this is addressed through development of <br />stocking procedures; <br />• determine impacts from competition/predation, and if necessary and feasible, <br />remove problematic species from essential areas; <br />• review sport-fishing practices and regulations, and implement remedial changes, <br />as needed; <br />• implement an information and education program on nonnative fish control; and <br />• implement an enforcement program to minimize incidental take of endangered <br />fishes. <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />i <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />