Laserfiche WebLink
These contaminants are causing unacceptable hazards to migratory waterfowl and <br />endangered fish in the area. This study provides the opportunity for a coordinated <br />effort among federal, state and local interests to resolve the region's critical water <br />resource problems, issues and opportunities. <br />b. Carbon/Emery Counties Water Management Study <br />This study is developing a Geographic Information System model linked to <br />an expert system and decision support software for use in formulating and <br />evaluating water management strategies for the full range of needs in the two- <br />county area. Carbon County is short of M&I water. Both Carbon and Emery <br />Counties have significant coal reserves, are suppliers of electricity (coal-fired <br />generation plants) and have tremendous recreation potential. Irrigated agriculture <br />has historically been a stabilizing influence on the region's economy. Two <br />Reclamation projects, Emery County and Scofield, are key to future water <br />management strategies in the area. The future of this two-county area is linked to <br />its water management strategies. The study will provide a comprehensive approach <br />among federal, state and local interests in developing a water management plan to <br />include: (1) reducing turbidity in the Price River and its tributaries, (2) augmenting <br />M&I water quality and quantity in Carbon County, (3) integrating salinity <br />management strategies into overall watershed plants, (4) protecting water rights, <br />(5) protecting critical reaches in streams and (6) meeting instream flow <br />requirements. <br />3. Colorado <br />a. Mesa County Water Conservation Study <br />This study will quantify the volume of water that can be potentially <br />salvaged from the Grand Valley Irrigation Company and Orchard Mesa Irrigation <br />District irrigation delivery systems and develop plans to implement water <br />conservation practices. The plans will provide recommendations for increasing <br />water delivery system efficiencies and address issues associated with protecting <br />conserved water within the context of state water law. It is anticipated that <br />approximately 35,000 to 40,000 acre-feet may be saved annually through the <br />elimination of waste. It is envisioned that a substantial portion of the conserved <br />water would be dedicated to endangered species recovery purposes. <br />G. RESERVOIR OPERATIONS <br />1. 1998 Operations Summary and Reservoir Status <br />Water year 1998 observed near-normal hydrologic conditions in the basin <br />with near- normal precipitation translating into average snowpack. At the beginning <br />of the runoff season, the Basinwide snowpack was 100 percent of normal. Great <br />media and public attention focused on the strong EI Nino Southern Oscillation <br />anomaly present in the equatorial region of the Pacific Ocean and the potential <br />effect this might have on the Colorado River Basin. Reservoir drawdowns in the <br />winter of 1998 were slightly greater than normal in a conservative attempt to <br />prepare for potential high spring runoff. However, water year 1998 did not have <br />the spring precipitation, cold temperatures, and extreme runoff that characterized <br />54 <br />