Laserfiche WebLink
Table 3.--Sediment-transport equations derived from sediment discharges <br />measured at station 09260050 Yampa River at Deerlodge Park <br />[Qs, sediment discharge in tans per day; Q, water discharge in cubic feet per <br />second; R2, coefficient of determination; SE, standard error of <br />estimate in percent; n, sample size; mm, millimeter] <br />Type of sediment <br />discharge Regression equation R2 SE n <br />Total----------------------- Q = 0.290 Qz.2s <br />s <br />Suspended------------------- Q = O.I25 Qi•3s <br />s <br />Bedload--------------------- Qs = 0.702 Qo.so <br />Sand and gravel------------- <br />Silt and clay--------------- <br />0.062-0.25 mm--------------- <br />0.25-1.0 mm----------------- <br />Q = <br />s 0.0160 Qi.4s <br />Q = <br />s 0.486 Qi.i2 <br />Q = <br />s 0.004545 Qi.77 <br />Q = <br />s 0.0904 Qi.is <br />0.79 67 31 <br />0.76 $8 33 <br />0.54 79 31 <br />0.82 73 31 <br />0.56 116 31 <br />0.88 65 31 <br />0.55 130 31 <br />Coarser than 1.0------------ Qs = 0.147 Q°•76 0.24 201 31 <br />Juan River near Bluff, Utah (Leopold and others, 1964, p. 230}, exhibit con- <br />spicuous differences in the relation of sediment discharge to water discharge <br />during rising spring flows and recessional summer flows. As a result of <br />obser"vations during the 1982 field season, in which suspended sediment concen- <br />trations during rising streamflows appeared to be generally higher than <br />concentrations during recessional streamflows, it was suspected that seasonal <br />differences in sediment discharge may be typical of the Yampa River at <br />Deerlodge Park. <br />Streamflow and sediment discharge data were reexamined to determine the <br />significance of seasonality on sediment transport through Deerlodge Park. <br />Sediment discharge and water discharge data from 1982 and 1983 were subdivided <br />into groups on the basis of occurrence during the rising hydrograph or the <br />recessional hydrograph. Measurements made from February through May were <br />categorized as rising-hydrograph measurements, and those made from June <br />through July were categorized as recessional-hydrograph measurements. ~east- <br />squares linear-regression equations describing measured sediment discharge as <br />a function of water discharge, similar to those in table 3, were recomputed <br />from data in the subgroups. The regression equation slope and intercept <br />values from both subgroups were analyzed with a Student t-test to determine <br />whether significant differences existed between sediment discharge relations <br />associated with rising and recessional hydrographs. At the 95-percent level <br />of significance, no differences between the sediment transport equations <br />representing rising and recessional hydrographs were confirmed for total <br />sediment discharge, suspended-sediment discharge, or the discharge of sediment <br />16 <br />