My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7119 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Public
>
7119 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:02:29 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:45:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7119
Author
Emery, L.
Title
Physiological effects of electrofishing.
USFW Year
1984.
USFW - Doc Type
February 3-4, 1984.
Copyright Material
NO
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Table 5. Incidence of injured vertebrae in electroshocked bluegills exposed <br />to different voltages and currents (Adapted from Spencer 1967) during <br />exposure times ranging from 1-120 seconds, <br /> <br />Equipment <br />Average <br />percentage injured <br />AC 230 V, 3.1 amp 12.2 <br />AC 115 V, 2.0 amp 4.6 <br />DC 115 V, 1.9 amp 1.5 <br />These two examples point out the serious differences between ac and do currents and their <br />effects on fish. Pulsed do is the f`~/orite among most biologists today because of its <br />ability to produce a good electrotactic response, minimize injuries, and is generally less <br />costly to operate than other battery powered do systems. All this is not to say, however, <br />that ac should not, or cannot, be used. One should be particularly careful whenever using <br />ac systems and recognize its dangers and drawbacks. Ac systems appear to be most suitable <br />in situations where the water conductivities are very low (e.g „ soft waters with less than <br />50 mg/1 total alkalinity). <br />Suggestions for Field Application <br />1. Electrofishing works because fish are drawn involuntarily toward an anode or are in- <br />capacitated in such a way that they can be easily collected. <br />2. It is important to target the species pursued as size, species, physiological state, <br />and habitat all influence electrofishing success. <br />3. Electrofishing stresses a fish. Fish can suffer extreme physiological changes as a <br />result of electrofishing and it is important that the collector be aware of these <br />stress potentials whenever using electrofishing equipment. <br />4. It is important that one monitor fish collected by electrofishing and observe their <br />recovery to insure that power settings are not lethal. It is also important to <br />remember that it is the total electrical energy absorbed by the fish that deter~rines <br />whether that fish will live or die. <br />5. Delayed mortality has been observed in fish collected by electrofishing. Most mortality <br />occurs within the first 24 hours. Fish that show external signs of injury as a result <br />of capture are most likely to show delayed mortality. Burn marks on fish are indi- <br />cators of excessive electrical power. <br />6. Pulsed do produces the least physiological damage to fish .compared with those collected <br />with do or ac electrofishing equipment. <br />ACKNOWLEDGMENTS <br />Much of the information contained herein was taken from the unpublished "Print%ples and <br />Techniques of Electrofishing" manual used for teaching the Electrofishing Course given by <br />the Fisheries Academy. Much of the material contained in that manual was-written or col- <br />lected by Dr. R~~chard S. Wydoski, and I want to thank him for allowing me to use portions <br />of that material for this presentation. I would also like to thank Larry Kolz, of the <br />Denver Wildlife Research Center, for use of his arctic grayling photograph, and Carolyn <br />Banks and Monte Stuckey for preparing the graphics. <br />CAL-NEVA WILDLIFE TRANSACTIONS 19$4 <br />70 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.