Laserfiche WebLink
SECTION 1. GENETICS <br />Enhancement and perpetuation of the resource is the common goal of <br />all fisheries management programs. Genetic considerations are <br />vital to this goal because fish are a product of their genes, the <br />environment, and of the interaction between the two. The genetic <br />characteristics of a given fish population, in concert with the <br />environment, determine the quality and longevity of the fishery <br />resource. Unlike the goals of commercial aquaculture which select <br />for optimum performance in the hatchery environment, fish reared <br />for rehabilitation or restoration purposes must perform in the <br />wild. Fisheries managers must realize that the implementation of <br />many "standard hatchery practices" affect the genetic make-up of <br />fish stocks and impact the potential for survival and performance <br />in the wild. It should always be remembered that one cannot select <br />for traits in the hatchery that will insure performance in the <br />wild. <br />Traditionally, fisheries managers have concentrated on the <br />manipulation of non-genetic parameters to alter `or "improve°' the <br />quality of their product. This approach, has allowed for <br />inadvertent changes in the genetic make-up of fish stocks. Long- <br />term management implications related to these genetic changes have <br />not been considered. The disregard for the genetic make-up of fish <br />stocks is extremely unfortunate as relatively minor changes in <br />management practices may result in substantial impacts on the <br />genetic integrity of fish stocks. Management activities that do <br />not reflect consideration--for genetic impact can result in changes <br />in the genetic integrity of stocks that may prove difficult if not <br />impossible to rectify. <br />Evolutionary geneticists have long been aware that genetic <br />variation is an important aspect of the genetic make-up of managed <br />fish stocks. The long-term utility of genetic variation is that it <br />allows fish populations to adapt to changing environmental <br />conditions. The genetic diversity of a population is a finite <br />resource that with improper management can be lost. Kincaid, 1976 <br />(1), found that the loss of genetic variation in rainbow trout <br />reduces hatching success, growth, survival, and disease resistance. <br />He found that a 25~ reduction in heterozygosity resulted in a 38~ <br />increase in morphological deformities, a 19~ decrease in fry <br />survival, and a 23~ reduction in weight gain after 364 days. <br />During the past several decades, broodstocks have inadvertently <br />undergone intense genetic selection and manipulation. Despite the <br />best of intentions, management practices have been conducted with <br />little or no understanding of genetic principles and potential <br />genetic ramifications. As a result, a significant portion of the <br />1-1 <br />