Laserfiche WebLink
7O NESLER ET AL. <br />TABLE 1.-Catches of Colorado squawfish larvae in the Yampa River, Colorado, 1980-1986. <br /> <br /> <br />Year Number <br />of <br />samples Capture <br />locations <br />Capture dates (river km) Number <br />of larvae <br />collected Size <br />range <br />(mme) <br /> Seine and dip-net collections <br />1980 215 Aug 23-25 0.2-13.9 46 14.0-29.0 <br />1981 423 Ju124-Aug 15 0.2-28.8 23 9.0-22.0 <br />1982 295 Jul 7-25 0.5-19.6 20 9.9-21.0 <br />1983 245 Jul 22-Aug 2] 1.1-]9.8 228 8.6-16.6 <br />1984 148 Jul 7b-Aug 6 0.2-25.4 249 8.1-15.1 <br /> Drift-net co~ections <br />1983 ]29 Jul 22-Aug 21 3.1 102 7.3-9.3 <br />1984 168 Jul 17-Aug 8 3.1 89 7.2-9.5 <br />1985 204 Jul 9-Aug 16 3.1 455 7.9-10.0 <br />1986 198 ]ul 15-Ju131 0.1 124 8.4-11.0 <br />eTotal length. <br />the suspended debris load. Samples were returned <br />to the Larval Fish Laboratory, Colorado State <br />University, for processing. Colorado squawfish <br />larvae were measured (total length) to the nearest <br />0.1 mm under a binocular dissecting microscope <br />and assigned to a developmental phase (Snyder <br />1981). Further details of the sampling methodol- <br />ogy were described by Haynes et al. (1985) and <br />Nesler (1986). <br />Based on growth data provided by Hamman <br />(1981), an age-growth relationship for hatchery- <br />reared Colorado squawfish larvae during their first <br />107 d of life posthatching was developed by regres- <br />sion analysis (Haynes et al. 1985). These analyses <br />showed that the age-growth relationship for Colo- <br />rado squawfish larvae was best described in two <br />distinct phases and resulted in two predictive equa- <br />tions for estimating posthatching age of individual <br />larvae (Figure 2). The equation for larvae smaller <br />than 22 mm total length was the principal one used <br />because over 93% of the Colorado squawfish lar- <br />vae collected were in this size range (Table 1). <br />Hamman (1981) reported that the incubation time <br />for Colorado squawfish eggs was 3.5-6 d at water <br />temperatures of 20-22°C. For the purpose of pre- <br />dicting spawning time, 5 d were added to estimated <br />posthatching ages to account for incubation time. <br />The combined incubation time and larval post- <br />hatching age was used to back-calculate spawning <br />time from the date of capture for individual larvae. <br />Estimated spawning dates for individual larvae <br />were aggregated in a frequency distribution that <br />demonstrated beginning and ending dates and peak <br />periods of spawning. <br />Comparisons of Colorado squawfish spawning <br />periods with Yampa River flow regimes were <br />made for each year from 1980 through 1986. Daily <br />water discharge records from June 16 through <br />August 15 for the Yampa River were compiled for <br />each year from U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) <br />data collected at the Maybell (1934-1986) and <br />Deerlodge (1982-1986) gages (USGS 1934-1986; <br />a <br />C7 <br />z_ <br />U <br />Q <br />O <br />a <br />a <br />0 <br />A= -76.7105-17.4949E <br />1.0555L2+0.0221 L3 <br />L< 22mm <br />5 10 15 20 <br />TOTAL LENGTH (L) IN MM <br />a <br />C7 <br />z_ <br />U <br />a <br />x <br />a <br />A = -26.6421 ~- 2.7798E <br />00 <br />0 <br />80 <br />60 <br />L=22 -47mm <br />40 <br />30 40 <br />TOTAL LENGTH (L) IN MM <br />FicuRe 2.-Relationships of total length (L, ± 0.1 <br />mm) to posthatching age for young-of--the-year Colorado <br />squawfish. The upper curve applies to larval fish less <br />than 22.0 mm long; the lower curve applies [o fish of <br />22.0-47.0 mm. <br />