Laserfiche WebLink
American Fisheries Society Symposium 5:80-88, 1988 <br />© Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 1988 <br />Variation in Pigment and Nape Morphology of <br />Larval Tidepool Sculpin <br />JEFFREY B. MARLIAVE <br />Vancouver Public Aquarium, Post O„~'ice Box 3232 <br />Vancouver, British Columbia V6B 3X8, Canada <br />Abstract.-Key characters for the identification of yolk-sac larvae of the tidepool sculpin <br />Oligocottus maculosus include [he presence of a nape bubble and the count of postanal ventral <br />midline (PVM) melanophores. However, both of these features vary among larvae of this species, <br />limiting their taxonomic utility. In addition, previously undescribed pigment patterns on the ventral <br />and lateral gut are polymorphic, being present or absent in different geographic regions and in <br />different clutches. Precocial development of cranial pigment occurs by the time of hatching in some <br />larvae. Clinal geographic variation occurs in counts of PVM melanophores. Certain combinations <br />of these pigment and nape variants make identification of such larvae on the basis of previous <br />descriptions very difficult. Unusual pigment patterns of reared larvae appear more likely attribut- <br />able to limited sources of animals for culture than to artifacts of the culture environment. <br />Identification of fish larvae requires integration <br />of diverse information, yet it ultimately involves <br />the matching of available, recognizable" similar- <br />ities between specimens (Powles and Markle <br />1984). Such unique character states tend to be <br />fewer among larvae than among adult fishes. Of <br />the characters most often used for larvae, pigment <br />is the only type that has been used for all early life <br />history stages and at all taxonomic levels in sys- <br />tematic investigations (Kendall et al. 1984). Ken- <br />dall et al. (1984) discussed the problems of using <br />pigment as a taxonomic character, and they sug- <br />gested that the most serious difficulties involve <br />convergence of pigment patterns in unrelated spe- <br />cies and the physiologically variable state of me- <br />lanophore contraction. Although Powles and <br />Markle (1984) indicated that regional variation in <br />appearance of larvae can cause problems with <br />identification, there appears to be little published <br />documentation of polymorphic or clinal variation <br />in pigment patterns or in other features indicated <br />as diagnostic characters. One exception is a study <br />of myomere-count variation among Mississippi <br />River fish larvae (Bosley and Conner 1984). The <br />pragmatic requirement for usable key characters <br />to identify fish larvae appears to have resulted in <br />rather broad acceptance of pigment patterns as <br />conservative diagnostic characters, especially <br />with marine species. Although generally correct, <br />such acceptance causes problems when pigment <br />variants exist within a species. Similar confusion <br />can result from polymorphism of other types of <br />diagnostic characters as well, especially when <br />several of such features can vary. <br />The present study provides evidence for extreme <br />variability in a number of the diagnostic characters <br />cited for identification of yolk-sac larvae of the <br />tidepool sculpin Oligocottus tnaeulosus. Most of <br />these variable characters are pigment patterns such <br />as cranial, lateral, and ventral gut melanophores <br />that had not been observed on specimens from the <br />open Pacific coast from California to Washington <br />(Stein 1973; Washington 1981). In addition, the <br />unusual nape bubble described by Washington <br />(1981) for preflexion tidepool sculpin larvae varies <br />from being prominent on some larvae to absent on <br />others. An analysis of these features indicates pa- <br />rental effects within a locality, as well as geographic <br />patterns of variation. <br />Methods <br />Yolk-sac larvae were obtained from locations in <br />southwestern British Columbia from the outer <br />coast of Vancouver Island around to the inland <br />waters surrounding the city of Vancouver (Figure <br />1). Eyed-egg masses were collected from the <br />Mytilus Balanus intertidal zone in most areas and <br />incubated in running seawater. Larvae were killed <br />in 1% fotmalin in seawater upon hatching, then <br />fixed in 3% fotmalin. In certain localities, larvae <br />were collected in plankton tows in rocky near- <br />shore areas (Marliave 1986). Tows were limited to <br />3-5 min duration, so that larvae were alive on <br />completion of a tow, then larvae were killed and <br />fixed as for cultured ones. Field-caught larvae <br />were sorted and identified with dissecting stereo- <br />microscopes,which were also used for counts and <br />measurements. <br />80 <br />