My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7636
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7636
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:45 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:36:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7636
Author
National Research Council
Title
Editor
USFW Year
Series
USFW - Doc Type
1992
Copyright Material
YES
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
571
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SUMMARY 13 <br />tive aquatic ecosystem restoration and, in some cases, a valuable source <br />of volunteer labor to accomplish restoration. <br />A new emphasis on resource stewardship and restoration cannot <br />succeed without public understanding and support. Thus, educa- <br />tional programs aimed at raising the level of public knowledge and <br />comprehension of aquatic ecosyste-m restoration rationales, goals, and <br />methods should receive adequate government funding. <br />The committee believes that hydrological advisory services should <br />be operated by states or federal agencies to provide technical assis- <br />tance to groups interested in stream and river restoration. Universi- <br />ties with experts in natural resources or hydrology and water re- <br />sources institutes, based at universities in every state, also should <br />contribute technical assistance required for the restoration of aquatic <br />ecosystems through free or at-cost expert hydrological and biological <br />advisory services. <br />CONCLUSION <br />Without an active and ambitious restoration program in the United <br />States, our swelling population and its increasing stresses on aquatic <br />ecosystems will certainly reduce the quality of human life for present <br />and future generations. By embarking now on a major national aquatic <br />ecosystem restoration program, the United States can set an example <br />of aquatic resource stewardship that ultimately will also impxove the <br />management of other resource types and will set an international <br />example of environmental leadership. <br />REFERENCES <br />Benke, A. C. 1990. A perspective on America's vanishing streams. J. Am. Benthol. Soc. <br />9(1):77-78. <br />Bradshaw, A. D. 1983. The reconstruction of ecosystems. J. Appl. Ecol. 20:1-17. <br />Clean Water Act of 1977. P.L. 95-217, Dec. 27, 1977, 91 Stat. 1566. <br />Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990. P.L. 101-624. <br />Kusler, J. A., and M. E. Kentula, eds. 1989. Wetland Creation and Restoration: The <br />Status of the Science. Vol. I-II. U.S. EPA/7600/3-89/038. U.S. EPA Environmental <br />Research Laboratory, Corvallis, fire. <br />U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI), National Park Service. 1982. The Nationwide <br />Rivers Inventory, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. <br />U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1990. The Quality of Our Natiori s <br />Water. EPA 440/4-90-005, Washington, D.C. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.