Laserfiche WebLink
RESTORATION OF AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS <br />commodated by channelization, resulting in further loss of stream <br />habitat. This has led to aquatic organisms becoming extinct or im- <br />periled in increasing numbers and to the impairment of many benefi- <br />cial water uses, including drinking, swimming, and fishing. <br />Although public and private decisions to manage aquatic ecosys- <br />tems have enhanced water transportation, developed sources of hy- <br />droelectric power, reduced flood hazards, and provided water for <br />municipal, industrial, and agricultural purposes, these activities have <br />also altered the physical, chemical, and biological processes within <br />aquatic ecosystems. This committee is convinced that U.S. public <br />opinion strongly supports an increased level of attention to environ- <br />mental protection. The nation's investment in different types of en- <br />vironmental programs has been considerable but piecemeal and has <br />not always been effective. An accelerated effort toward environmen- <br />tal restoration and preservation is needed. The committee believes <br />that a comprehensive and aggressive restoration component should <br />be the centerpiece of such an effort. <br />The premise of this report is that ecological restoration of aquatic <br />ecosystems is possible. Restoration means returning an ecosystem to <br />a close approximation of its condition prior to disturbance. Accom- <br />plishing restoration means ensuring that ecosystem structure and function <br />are recreated or repaired, and that natural dynamic ecosystem pro- <br />cesses are operating effectively again. At times, however, restoration <br />may be impractical or undesirable, as when a body of water that is <br />naturally without fish is successfully transformed through stocking <br />into a valuable trout fishery or when important urban developments <br />have been situated on wetlands. In such cases, the committee recog- <br />nizes that the economic value of these developments may preclude <br />any attempt to restore preexisting natural systems at these locations. <br />The committee also recognizes that preventive measures to protect <br />aquatic ecosystems are important and that priority should be given <br />to preventive measures that benefit more than one portion of the <br />hydrologic cycle. Had environmental protection been adequate in <br />the past, many expensive restoration projects would not be necessary <br />today. <br />Naturally, restoration of aquatic ecosystems may be accomplished <br />in stages, and particular ecosystem functions and characteristics- <br />such as potable water-may be restored even when other ecosystem <br />characteristics deviate from natural conditions. Thus, in certain situ- <br />ations, partial ecological restoration may be the operant management <br />goal and may provide significant ecological benefits even though full <br />restoration is not attained. <br />Therefore, since the loss and impairment of aquatic ecosystems is <br />