Laserfiche WebLink
• • { <br />-14- <br />certain that construction of the three main storage dams changed river <br />conditions sufficiently to either contribute further to the decline or <br />prevent the natural recovery of these species. <br />The squawfish is now extinct below Lake Mead almost certainly due to the <br />fact that it was denied access to upstream spawning areas. The last <br />verified capture of this species was in 1967 (Hinckley 1973). The humpback <br />chub was never reported from the lower river other than from just below the <br />Hoover Dam site. It has not been taken since the dam was constructed and <br />is also extinct in the lower river. <br />The bonytail chub may persist in small numbers in Lakes Havasu and Mohave. <br />Occasional reports are received of bonytail being taken by fishermen. The <br />last verified capture was of a 2.5 kg specimen caught just below Davis Dam <br />in 1975. The humpback sucker is faring somewhat better than the chub. <br />Adult specimens are taken occasionally by biologists as well as fishermen <br />in parts of the lower river. Both the bonytail and the sucker are apparently <br />able to reproduce in the Lower river, although they are nowhere.. abundant and only <br />one juvenile specimen has ever been encountered--a humpback sucker taken in <br />a canal in Imperial County. <br />One effect of the changed river environment was that conditions became more <br />favorable for exotic species. Channel catfish (Ietalurus purcetatus), carp <br />(Cyprinus carpio), largemouth black bass (Micropterus salmoides) and other <br />sunfish (Centrarchidae), and rainbow trout (SaZmo gaiz~irceri) had been planted <br />in the. river at various times earlier in the century, but had. never become <br />abundant. The Coldwater discharge. of Hoover Dam. created. ideal conditions <br />for rainbow trout and a hatchery was soon built below the dam to support a <br />growing trout fishery in this section of the river. The black bass. and sunfish <br />seemed to benefit most from increased water clarity, while the. carp and <br />channel catfish appeared to benefit from "stabilized" flows. As the fisheries <br />for the exotic species expanded it was only natural that biologists should <br />concentrate their efforts on managing these and others that might be suited <br />to the changed river environment, rather than the native fishes. <br />Until the dams were built, use of the lower river for fishing or other forms <br />of recreation was low. Following completion of the three major dams, <br />recreational use, primarily fishing, expanded greatly. Although there are <br />no early estimates of angler use, the good fishing in Lake Havasu in the <br />1940's (0.5 fish per angler hour; Dill 1944) had attracted enough fishermen <br />that by 1965 the catch rate had declined to less than 0.2 fish per hour. <br />These statistics are probably indicative of a trend throughout the lower <br />basin, for by the early 1960's biologists were attempting to improve fishing <br />by adding new species to the fauna. In the late 1950's and early 1960's, <br />striped bass (Mororee saxatiZis) and flathead catfish (PiZodictis oZivaris) <br />were successfully introduced. Although fishing success is generally low for <br />these species, they have provided angling for trophy-sized fish, perhaps <br />filling the role formerly played by the Colorado squawfish. <br />