Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />interpretations were being drawn and reports were <br />being written and synthesized into <br />recommendations. The timing of the review, the <br />shifting deadlines, and the consequent frustration <br />were, for the most part, borne patiently. The <br />bureau's extension of the deadline for the GCES <br />integration report and of the committee's review <br />schedule was appreciated. <br />One of the results of these events is that the <br />final report of the GOES team already contains some <br />of the benefit of the committee's scrutiny. This <br />was an exceptional benefit of the cooperative <br />interaction that the committee and the GCES team <br />achieved. The committee consciously has tried to <br />remain objective about the task, and has written <br />what it hopes to be a useful critique for the <br />Bureau of Reclamation and for the citizens of the <br />Southwest. <br />I am pleased to have worked with both these <br />groups. <br />G. Richard Marzolf, Chairman <br />Committee to Review the Glen <br />Canyon Environmental Studies <br />xiv <br />