My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7424
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7424
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:45 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:29:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7424
Author
National Research Council
Title
Editor
USFW Year
Series
USFW - Doc Type
1987
Copyright Material
YES
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Glen Canyon and in Grand Canyon represented an <br />increasingly vocal and significant economic force. <br />These river users heightened the National Park <br />Service's concerns about their missions in the face <br />of increasing use of the river. These issues were <br />creating a situation that could not be overlooked. <br />The board was interested in helping and appointed <br />a capable committee that eagerly undertook the <br />task. The members of the Committee to Review the <br />Glen Canyon Environmental Studies achieved solid <br />rapport with the GCES investigators and interaction <br />quickly became productive. The review presented in <br />this report was conducted with candor and received <br />in good spirit. <br />The committee was directed to (1) review and <br />advise on the Glen Canyon Environmental Studies in <br />progress, and give a general assessment of how well <br />these activities were achieving their intended <br />goals; (2) advise on interpretation of information <br />for impact analysis from the technical data <br />developed; (3) provide advice on the process of <br />identifying the environmental elements for ranking <br />operational alternatives for Glen Canyon Dam; and <br />(4) extrapolate from this case study <br />recommendations to others who may pursue similar <br />environmental studies at other sites in the future. <br />To fulfill its assigned tasks, the committee <br />provided general advice to the GOES research team <br />at three committee meetings, and the GCES project <br />manager was advised of the committee's progress <br />through quarterly summary reports. The assessment <br />of how well the GCES were achieving their intended <br />goals is given in detail in Chapter 4 of this <br />report. The assessment was difficult because the <br />GCES objectives were not clearly articulated at the <br />beginning, scientific objectives were confused with <br />management/policy objectives, and objectives <br />changed during the course of the study. <br />Members of the committee agree that changes in <br />the operation of Glen Canyon Dam were reflected in <br />measurable changes in the natural resources in the <br />X1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.