Laserfiche WebLink
Glen Canyon and in Grand Canyon represented an <br />increasingly vocal and significant economic force. <br />These river users heightened the National Park <br />Service's concerns about their missions in the face <br />of increasing use of the river. These issues were <br />creating a situation that could not be overlooked. <br />The board was interested in helping and appointed <br />a capable committee that eagerly undertook the <br />task. The members of the Committee to Review the <br />Glen Canyon Environmental Studies achieved solid <br />rapport with the GCES investigators and interaction <br />quickly became productive. The review presented in <br />this report was conducted with candor and received <br />in good spirit. <br />The committee was directed to (1) review and <br />advise on the Glen Canyon Environmental Studies in <br />progress, and give a general assessment of how well <br />these activities were achieving their intended <br />goals; (2) advise on interpretation of information <br />for impact analysis from the technical data <br />developed; (3) provide advice on the process of <br />identifying the environmental elements for ranking <br />operational alternatives for Glen Canyon Dam; and <br />(4) extrapolate from this case study <br />recommendations to others who may pursue similar <br />environmental studies at other sites in the future. <br />To fulfill its assigned tasks, the committee <br />provided general advice to the GOES research team <br />at three committee meetings, and the GCES project <br />manager was advised of the committee's progress <br />through quarterly summary reports. The assessment <br />of how well the GCES were achieving their intended <br />goals is given in detail in Chapter 4 of this <br />report. The assessment was difficult because the <br />GCES objectives were not clearly articulated at the <br />beginning, scientific objectives were confused with <br />management/policy objectives, and objectives <br />changed during the course of the study. <br />Members of the committee agree that changes in <br />the operation of Glen Canyon Dam were reflected in <br />measurable changes in the natural resources in the <br />X1 <br />