Laserfiche WebLink
9 <br />MINERAL DEVELOPMENT <br />The Park Service lacks adequate authority or <br />resources to prevent threats to park waters from <br />past, present and future mining and oil and gas <br />activities, both within and beyond park boundaries. <br />Mining and drilling activities -past, present and <br />future -seriously threaten park water resources, <br />and in many situations, the Park Service lacks ade- <br />quate authority or resources to prevent adverse <br />impacts. <br />The long history of poorly regulated mining <br />activity, particularly in the West, has littered the <br />landscape with abandoned mining sites. Many of <br />these sites are now located within units of the <br />National Park System, or near parks on their water- <br />shed lands. Abandoned mine sites often leach or <br />drain heavy metals, acids and harmful chemicals into <br />surface and ground water, poisoning plant and ani- <br />mal communities. For example, two acres of tailings <br />at an abandoned mine site in Wrangell-St. Elias <br />National Park and <br />Preserve are currently <br />leaching heavy metals into <br />park waters. This park <br />alone includes more than <br />400 abandoned mine or <br />oil and gas development <br />sites. <br />Despite the serious <br />threats posed to park <br />waters from abandoned <br />mine sites, the Park <br />Service lacks the resources <br />and authorities necessary <br />to solve pollution prob- <br />lems. First, the Park <br />Service often lacks ade- <br />quate funding to conduct <br />the studies needed to <br />define the scope and seri- <br />ousness of abandoned <br />mine site pollution prob- <br />lems. Furthermore, even <br />where it has data demon- <br />strating impacts to park <br />resources, the Park Service <br />lacks authority to compel <br />federal and state hazardous waste regulators to initi- <br />ate remedial clean-up actions. This problem is com- <br />plicated by the fact that regulatory agencies typically <br />give priority to cleaning up sites that threaten human <br />health. Moreover, remedial action has often been <br />delayed by the difficulty of attributing legal responsi- <br />bility for abandoned mine sites. At Yellowstone <br />National Park, -for example, the abandoned McLaren <br />mine tailings pile drained and leached poisonous <br />chemicals into Soda Butte Creek, which flows into <br />the park, for years before the Environmental <br />Protection Agency initiated action to stabilize the site. <br />Although the EPA is considering new regula- <br />tions to address the problem of abandoned mine sites <br />on federal public lands, no proposed regulations have <br />yet been promulgated. Furthermore, remedies will be <br />difficult to achieve unless regulations are accompa- <br />nied by a commitment of adequate program funding. <br />At present, for example, EPA commits less than one- <br />half of one full time position to investigation of pollu- <br />tion from mining operations in the entire state of <br />Alaska. <br />Existing and potential mining activities within <br />parks, or on their watershed lands, are better con- <br />trolled than abandoned sites, but still present serious <br />threats to park waters. While the filing of new mining <br />claims is prohibited on federal lands in all parks, the <br />i,az_. , ,~.~ ~f f: - <br />l .~ ,,, ~ ~ ~ z, err;., <br />4F' ~ ~ <br />~~ <br />39 <br />Past, present and future mining on the watershed lands of Yellowstone and other national parks threaten to <br />pollute park waters with heavy metals, acids and other damaging chemicals. <br />