Laserfiche WebLink
t <br />92 MUTH ET AL. <br />TABLE l.-Relative intensity of fluorescent marks in <br />otoliths from Colorado squawfish larvae that were im- <br />mersed in tetracycline hydrochloride (TC} solutions. <br />Mark intensities were determined for five larvae from <br />each treatment and sampling time (days after treatment) <br />and were ranked 0-3 (absent-bright). Values were <br />summed within each sample lot to produce a batch <br />mark-intensity value. All fish immersed in TC solutions <br />of 350 or 500 mg/L for 36 h died during treatment. <br /> Mark intensity by TC concentration and <br /> exposure time <br /> <br />Days after 200 mg/L 350 mg/L 500 mg~L <br />treatment 4 b 12 h 36 h 4 b 12 h 4 h 12 h <br />0 5 9 10 10 14 !0 14 <br />7 5 10 12 12 15 13 14 <br />28 5 8 12 15 14 14 15 <br />56 5 10 13 13 IS 14 <br />77 5 9 13 14 t4 14 <br />Figure 2). Marks appeared as yellow fluorescent <br />bands against adark-green background and were <br />retained throughout the 11-week experiment with <br />no apparent decrease in intensity over time. Flu- <br />orescent marks in sagittae became slightly more <br />diffuse as otoliths changed shape with growth; <br />however, mark intensity was not affected (Figure <br />2). Overall, mark intensity was higher for the 350- <br />and 50(1-mg/L treatments than for the 200-mg/L <br />treatments, but mark intensity increased with <br />exposure time at all treatment concentrations. In <br />the second experiment, otoliths of all fathead <br />minnow larvae examined by UV-light microscopy <br />had fluorescent mazks similar to those observed in <br />otoliths of Colorado squawfish larvae. Mark in- <br />tensity was high for all three light-intensity expo- <br />sures throughout the 7-d experiment. <br />Discussion <br />Our results demonstrated that otoliths of proto- <br />larval Colorado squawfish can be successfully <br />marked by whole-body immersion in TC solu- <br />tions. Tetracycline deposited in otoliths of larval <br />fish has been successfully used as a mark for <br />several species (e.g., Hettler 1984; Tsukamoto <br />1985), but, to our knowledge, this demonstration <br />is the first documented use for marking the early <br />larvae of cyprinids. The technique is relatively <br />easy to use; reasonable in cost, and suitable for <br />the mass marking offish in the field; it offers 100% <br />marking success and at lower concentrations and <br />exposure times has no adverse effect on fish <br />mortality, growth, or development. For the best <br />survival and mark intensity, larvae should be <br />immersed in a solution of 350 mg TC/L for 4-12 h. <br />Hettler (1984) and Tsukamoto (1985) reported <br />similar results. Tsukamoto (1985) observed that <br />larval ayu survival decreased as exposure time in <br />500 mg TC/L increased. This relationship was not <br />noted at lower TC concentrations. The lowest ayu <br />survival occurred in TC concentrations of 500 <br />mg/L or greater for all exposure times tested. <br />Tsukamoto also reported that TC treatment had no <br />affect on ayu growth, and he recommended whole- <br />body immersion in 200-300 mg TC/L for 3-24 h for <br />otolith marking. Hettler (1984) found that the per- <br />centage of larval spots with otoliths that were suc- <br />cessfully marked by oxytetracycline hydrochloride <br />(OTC, a compound closely related to TC) increased <br />as exposure time was increased, and it reached <br />100% in OTC concentrations of 250 and 500 mg/L at <br />exposures of 120 and 60 min, respectively. <br />Mark Retention <br />The knowledge of mark-retention time is nec- <br />essary for mark-recapture studies. In our labora- <br />toryexperiments, TC deposits in otoliths of larval <br />Colorado squawfish were retained in detectable <br />amounts at least 77 d after treatment in all of the <br />fish that were examined. Larval ayu that were <br />treated with 100 mg TC/L for 7 h and then reared <br />in a greenhouse retained fluorescent marks in <br />their otoliths for at least 164 d (Tsukamoto 1985). <br />Several authors (Choate 1964; Trojnaz 1973; Laird <br />and Scott 1978; Hettler 1984; Brothers 1985) re- <br />ported that tetracycline-produced marks are labile <br />in light because sunlight deactivates the fluores- <br />cent properties of tetracycline compounds. How- <br />ever, they provided no confirmatory evidence that <br />marks in internal bony structures would be lost or <br />degraded under natural conditions. Deactivation <br />of tetracycline is presumably caused by molecular <br />excitation and subsequent decay through absorp- <br />tion of solar energy in the UV spectrum (particu- <br />larly at 360 nm, Weber and Ridgway 1967). Ex- <br />cited molecules of fluorescent substances are usu- <br />ally unstable and have a mean lifetime of only <br />about 10-s-10_9 s (Lehninger 1975). If this were <br />true, the reliability of tetracycline marking of <br />larval fish for use in field mark-recapture studies <br />would be suspect. However, this presumption is <br />questionable, particularly for TC deposited in the <br />otoliths of fish released into natural waters. In our <br />experiment using fathead minnow larvae treated <br />with TC, exposure of larvae to artificial white light <br />(in the 340-650 nm range) at surface light intensi- <br />ties as high as 1,000 lx during rearing in pure tap <br />water had no effect on the presence or intensity of <br />fluorescent marks in otoliths. Water absorbs UV <br />