My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7190
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7190
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:45 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:27:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7190
Author
Muth, R. T., T. P. Nesler and A. F. Wasowicz.
Title
Marking Cyprinid Larvae with Tetracycline.
USFW Year
1988.
USFW - Doc Type
89-95.
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />90 <br />MUTH ET AL. <br />tore or light) to alter growth patterns on bony <br />structures. Many marking studies offish early-life <br />stages have been primarily concerned with age or <br />growth determinations. Few successful methods <br />for marking fish embryos or early larvae, specifi- <br />cally for application in field investigation, have <br />been described (e.g., Muncy and D'Silva 1981; <br />Brothers 1985; Tsukamoto 1985). Brothers (1985) <br />and Tsukamoto (1985) considered otoliths ideal <br />for marking because they are the first permanent <br />calcified structures present in the earliest life <br />history stages of fish and are, effectively, biolog- <br />ical internal tags. We concluded that tetracycline <br />marking of otoliths would most likely meet our <br />requirements for an optimal mark. Tetracycline <br />compounds are well-known markers for calcified <br />structures, and they fluoresce yellow under ultra- <br />violet (UV) light (Milch et al. 1957; Weber and <br />Ridgway 1962, 1967; Choate 1964). They have <br />been used to mark larvae of several fish species, <br />for example, pinfish Lagodon rhomboides and <br />spot Leiostomus xanthurus (Hettler 1984) and ayu <br />Plecoglossus altivelis (Tsukamoto 1985), but their <br />application to cypriniform larvae has not been <br />reported. <br />Methods <br />Approximately 1,500 4-d-old (posthatching) <br />Colorado squawfish protolarvae (larvae prior to <br />development of median fin rays, sensu Snyder <br />1981) were obtained from the Dexter (New Mex- <br />ico) National Fish Hatchery in June 1986. The <br />larvae were placed in aflow-through holding <br />trough that received 20°C well water; 20-22°C <br />water was used by Hamman (1986) for hatchery <br />culture of Colorado squawfish embryos and lar- <br />vae. Most larvae were swim-up, still had 50-70% <br />of their yolk, and measured 7.5-8.0 mm total <br />length (TL). The sagitta and lapillus otoliths were <br />both present. After a 24-h acclimation period, <br />dead, damaged, or atypically behaving larvae <br />were removed. The remaining larvae were divided <br />into ten 140-specimen experimental groups. <br />Nine experimental groups were treated by plac- <br />ing the larvae in 1-L glass beakers containing <br />tetracycline hydrochloride (TC) solutions of 200, <br />350, or 500 mg TC/L aerated distilled water. <br />Distilled water was used as the diluent because <br />TC binds to calcium, and hard water, which <br />contains calcium ions, might hinder the uptake of <br />TC by the otoliths. Each TC test solution was <br />adjusted to pH 6.8-7.0 with tris buffer (Mettler <br />1984). The pH prior to buffering was about 3.6. <br />Exposure times for each concentration were 4, 12, <br />and 36 h. During their exposure, the treatment <br />groups were aerated and incubated in a covered <br />water bath at 20°C, but they were not fed. The <br />10th experimental group was maintained as a <br />control. <br />After each prescribed exposure, the treated <br />larvae were removed from the test solutions, and <br />the numbers of dead larvae were recorded. Sur- <br />viving larvae were placed in aerated well water in <br />3.8-L rearing jars and incubated in a water bath at <br />20°C. Control larvae were taken directly from the <br />holding trough and placed in a rearing jar. Rearing <br />jars were partially shaded with sheets of opaque <br />plastic. The photoperiod was about 9-h light: IS-h <br />dark; light intensity was 1001x. Larvae were fed <br />twice daily with live artemia Artemis sp. nauplii <br />and TetraMin Fry Diet. After about 4 weeks, <br />TetraMin Staple Food was included in the diet <br />(Muth et al. 1985). Before each feeding, the rear- <br />ing jars were cleaned, and the numbers of dead <br />larvae were recorded. Larvae were reared for up <br />to 77 d after treatment. <br />Ten living larvae from each experimental group <br />were preserved and measured (TL) immediately <br />after treatment and at weekly intervals thereafter. <br />Two different preservation fluids were tested, and <br />their effects on otolith structure and on TC-pro- <br />duced marks were compared. At each time inter- <br />val, five larvae were fixed and preserved in 95% <br />ethanol (pH = 8.0), and five were fixed and <br />preserved in formalin solutions buffered to pH 6.8 <br />with phosphate (Markle 1984). Larvae were fixed <br />in 10% buffered formatin for 24 h, then transferred <br />to 3% buffered formalin for storage. Samples were <br />stored in the dark until they were examined 3-4 <br />months after treatment. <br />Two whole larvae from each sample lot were <br />examined with incident UV light under adissect- <br />ing microscope for the presence of external fluo- <br />rescent marks. Sagittae and lapilli were extracted <br />from larvae by procedures similar to those de- <br />scribed by Brothers (1987) for embryonic and <br />larval fish. Otoliths were mounted in glycerin on <br />glass slides and examined with incident UV light <br />under a compound microscope for the presence <br />and intensity of fluorescent marks. The average <br />time spent on the extraction and mounting of <br />otoliths was about 10 min/specimen. The intensity <br />of the mark was determined for each of the larvae <br />that was examined, and it was ranked by a pro- <br />cedure similar to that used by Tsukamoto (1985). <br />The ranking categories that we designated were <br />absent, faint, lucid, or bright, corresponding to <br />values of 0, 1, 2, or 3, respectively. Individual <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.