Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CHANGES IN FISH COMMUNITIES FOLLOWING CONCRETE <br />LINING OF THE COACHELLA CANAL, SOUTHEASTERN CALIFORNIA <br />GORDON MUELLER, GARY BRYANT and TOM BURKE <br />Bureau of Reclamation <br />Lower Colorado Region <br />Boulder City, Nevada <br />ABSTRACT <br />~~~ ~f, <br />The fish community of a 3.4-km section of the concrete-lined Coachella Canal, Imperial County, California, <br />was comprised of six species, with an absolute density of 0.039 fishlm2 and estimated biomass of 4.367 g/m2. <br />When compared to studies conducts in the canal prior to lining, or in other unlined areas, these data suggest <br />reductions in species diversity (-14.3 to -62.5%), density (+S~ to -X3.8%), and biomass (-30.1 to -91.2%). <br />These data support speculations that numbers of river-adapted fish would remain relatively high in a concrete- <br />lined canal, .but lentic and cover-oriented fishes such as centrarchids would decline. <br />INTRODUCTION <br />Water is an increasingly important commodity in <br />the arid American southwest, and demands on this <br />limited resource have placed important emphases on <br />water conservation and salvage programs. Local, <br />State, and Federal agencies are vigorously involved in <br />identifying, developing, and implementing programs <br />to better utilize existing water resources (Bureau of <br />Reclamation 1984). <br />Canal lining is a common, cost effective method of <br />reducing seepage losses. In view of potential water <br />shortages, efforts are being made to accelerate canal <br />lining programs throughout the Imperial and Coachella <br />Valleys of southern California. If these conservation <br />programs are implemented, impacts of aquatic canal <br />communities could be substantial. <br />This paper presents new information concerning <br />the fishery which reestablished following canal lining, <br />and compares these data with those from investi- <br />gations simultaneously conducted on an unlined <br />portion of the same canal. Additional comparisons <br />are made to studies conducted in two reaches of the <br />Coachella Canal in November 1980, prior to lining <br />(Minckley et al. 1983). <br />STUDY AREA <br />In 1980, the first 78 km of the Coachella Canal, <br />southeastern California, were concrete lined as part of <br />the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project, <br />Title I. Our 1984 study site was a 3.4-km section of <br />canal located approximately 13 km north of its diver- <br />sion from the All-American Canal near Holtville, <br />California (Fig. 1). The concrete canal has a ratio of <br />1.5:1 side-slopes, bottom width is 4.9 m, and top <br />width is 16.3 m, with maximum water depth of 3.2 m. <br />Maximum designed discharge capacity is 44 m31s with <br />an operational water velocity of 1.4 mis. The same area <br />was sampled in 1980, before lining (Minckley et al. <br />1983). <br />METHODS <br />To enable pre- and post-lining comparisons, sampl- <br />ing techniques, location, season, and equipment were <br />similar to those used by Minckley et al. (1983). The <br />study area was subdivided into four sample sections <br />(A, B, C, D, up- to downstream) ranging in length from <br />244 m to 1610 m. Each section was blocked by 2.5-cm <br />bar-measure nets prior to water outage. Nets were <br />Mueller, G., Bryant, G., and Burke, T. 1989. Changes in Fish Communities Following Concrete Lining of <br />the Coachella Canal, Southeastern California. Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science 23:1-6. <br />