Laserfiche WebLink
CHANGE - 53 <br />ets, for aquaculture, and <br />difornia were meant to <br />this type was carp, now <br />basses, and sunfishes, <br />ies. This is not surprising <br />sh native to California is <br />introduced as reservoirs <br />ve generally been small <br />~panese subspecies), and <br />y hitch, and threespine <br />ahead minnow have also <br />rs been mainly the result <br />yen: introduced to help <br />Quito control is likewise <br />Oder, although it has also <br />n fish, and aquaculture <br />of and, as a result, other <br />oharyngodon idella) are <br />Js in ponds and canals. <br />Imperial Valley. <br />~ed by their proponents <br />~g vegetable matter into <br />hese exotics has resulted <br />lure, when some species, <br />ie main fishes raised for <br />,es and trouts. <br />:rs have released tropical <br />the detriment of the <br />t Valley, sailfin mollies, <br />ter escaping from ponds <br />eir charges and released <br />for most wild goldfish <br />,t plants. <br />lions. Logperch came in <br />~bably arrived as eggs on <br />into the Delta from the <br />mture of California's fish <br />of the state's waterways. <br />Bally responsible for the <br />Kcies are most abundant <br />st mostly in undisturbed <br />ressive, predaceous green <br />tbod regions they occur <br />.~ <br />only as scattered large adults, while native minnows remain abundant. If a stream <br />section is dammed, bulldozed, or otherwise changed the sunfish quickly take over and <br />the native fishes become uncommon (Moyle and Nichols, 1974). It is interesting to <br />note, however, that in trout streams native and introduced trout species may coexist, <br />apparently subdividing the resources available through behavioral interactions and <br />specializations. Nevertheless, it is possible in some situations for introduced species to <br />eliminate native ones through duect interactions: competition, predation, habitat <br />interference, and hybridization. <br />Direct competition between two species for a resource (usually food or space) in <br />limited supply, that results in one species being eliminated, is frequently invoked as a <br />cause for faunal changes, but it is in fact very difficult to demonstrate. If a new species <br />can survive in an undisturbed environment into which it has been introduced, it is <br />likely that it will reach some sort of population equilibrium with the species already <br />present, reducing the populations of the native fishes but not eliminating them <br />(Johannes and Larkin, 196I). Thus, the introduction of golden shiners into a <br />California trout lake usually results in decreased growth and reproduction of the trout <br />population but the trout seldom disappear altogether. However, one native California <br />fish species that seems to have been eliminated from its natural range due to <br />competition from introduced species is the Sacramento perch. Its disappearance from <br />the Sacramento~an Joaquin system was gradual (not obviously correlated with <br />environmental changes), yet it is very successful in a wide variety of ponds, reservoirs, <br />and lakes into which it has been introduced. The common denominator of these <br />waters is the absence of ecologically similar but more aggressive species, particularly <br />bluegill (Moyle, Mathews, and Bonderson, 1974). <br />Predation by an introduced species on a native one is another mechanism commonly <br />invoked to explain the disappearance of species. The classic example of this is the <br />projected elimination, by sea lamprey (Pteromyzon mvTinus) predation, of lake trout <br />and other large fishes from the upper Great Lakes_ Such situations, although <br />spectacular, are also exceptional. Most predators will cease hunting a particular prey <br />species long before it becomes extinct. It should be pointed out, however, that <br />predation by green sunfish does seem to have been responsible for local extinctions of <br />California roach, although habitat change may also have played a role. The sunfish <br />invade the intermittent roach streams, which are ecologically similar to their native <br />midwestern streams, and become trapped with the roach in the summer pools. Under <br />these circumstances they can easily eliminate the roach from the streams (Moyle and <br />Nichols, 1974). <br />Habitat interference occurs when an introduced species changes the habitat by its <br />activities and the change forces the native forms to leave or die out. Carp are the main <br />villains in this category since they root up the bottom, digging up aquatic plants and <br />greatly increasing the amount of suspended matter in the water. Fishes (including <br />many gamefishes) -that require clear water for feeding or breeding may have their <br />populations reduced or eliminated. In California the effect of carp is difficult to assess <br />because they live mostly in disturbed habitats. It is possrble, however, that they may <br />be partially responsible for the supposed reduction in the clarity of Clear Lake, Lake <br />County and for the gradual disappearance of its native frsh fauna. Habitat alteration is <br />