Laserfiche WebLink
Initial Contacts with the Disputing Parties 47 <br />the viability of mediation: He asks the respondent to explain <br />why he or she should use mediation, instead of promoting the <br />process himself. This intervenor places the respondent, not the <br />mediator, in the position of mediation advocate. <br />In cases in which the mediator is approached by both par- <br />ties, asignificant psychological step toward a cooperative reso- <br />lution to the dispute has been made. "Implicit in such an in- <br />vited third-party role are two assumptions: first, the disputants <br />are sufficiently motivated to address their conflict that one or <br />both of them are willing to enlist the services of a third party; <br />and second, the third party is regarded as sufficiently attractive <br />by one or both disputants that this party is invited to intervene <br />rather than some other individual. From the third party's van- <br />tage point, an invited role is desirable both because it suggests <br />that the disputants are ready to work and because the third <br />party is placed in a unique position to exercise influence" (Ru- <br />bin, 1981, p. 11). <br />To date, no data exist that correlate joint initiation of <br />mediation to successful intervention. Mediators, however, gen- <br />erally find that a cooperative initiation of mediation by all <br />parties usually minimizes escalatory dynamics between the dis- <br />putants at the beginning of the intervention and indicates will- <br />ingness to solve the dispute to the satisfaction of all. <br />Referrals by interested secondary parties, people who are <br />not principal actors in disputes, are another way that people ob- <br />tain mediation services. Secondary parties include two cate- <br />gories of persons or groups: first, parties who have no direct <br />stake in the settlement of a dispute bait are concerned about the <br />general ramifications of continued conflict; and second, parties <br />who, although they are not principal actors, do have tangible in- <br />vestment in the settlement of a dispute. <br />Examples of the first type of referral include close friends <br />or neighbors who refer parties to a mediator or the intervenor <br />to the parties, or a foundation that is concerned about general <br />community turmoil that could result from escalating conflict <br />(Lansford, 1983). These parties do not have a direct stake in the <br />outcome but do want the dispute settled. <br />Secondary parties who have a more direct interest in the <br />