My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8125
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
8125
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:47 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:26:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
8125
Author
Moore, C. W.
Title
Editor
USFW Year
Series
USFW - Doc Type
1986
Copyright Material
YES
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
371
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4 The Mediation Process <br />Conflict Management and Resolution Approaches <br />People in conflict in this society have a variety of means <br />of resolving their disputes. Figure 1 illustrates some of these <br />choices. Each of these options varies concerning the formality <br />of the process, the privacy of the approach, the people in- <br />volved, the authority of the third party (if there is one), the <br />type of decision that will result, and the amount of coercion <br />that is exercised by or on the disputing parties. <br />On the left-hand side of the continuum are informal, pri- <br />vate procedures that involve only the disputants. On the other <br />end, one party relies on coercion and often on public action to <br />force the opposing party into submission. In between area vari- <br />ety of approaches that we will examine in more detail. <br />Disagreements and problems can arise in almost any rela- <br />tionship. The majority of disagreements are usually handled in- <br />formally. People often aaoid each other because the issue is not <br />that important, because they do not have the power to force a <br />change, or because they do not believe that a change for the <br />better is possible. <br />When avoidance is not possible or tensions become so <br />strong that the parties cannot just let the disagreement ride, <br />they usually resort to informal problem-solving discussions to <br />resolve their differences. This is probably where the majority of <br />disagreements end in daily life. Either they are resolved, more <br />or less to the satisfaction of the people involved, or the issues <br />are dropped for lack of interest or lack of ability to push the <br />resolution through to a conclusion. <br />In the Singson-Whittamore case, the Whittamores avoided <br />dealing with their potential conflict with the medical clinic until <br />it was clear that Andrew was going to leave. At this point Andrew <br />initiated informal discussions. Neither approach was either ap- <br />propriate or successful in resolving their disagreement. Clearly <br />their disagreement had escalated into a dispute. Gulliver (1979, <br />p. 75) notes that a disagreement becomes a dispute "only when <br />the two parties are unable and/or unwilling to resolve their dis- <br />agreement; that is, when one or both are not prepared to accept <br />the status quo (should that any longer be a possibility) or to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.