Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />MODDE AND IRVING <br />rtvers, movement is triggered by temperature, and <br />in others, flow initiated migration (Jonsson 1991). <br />Undoubtedly, there is interaction between these <br />stimuli, and fish probably respond to discharge <br />within some range of temperatures. <br />Telemetry data indicated that movement of adult <br />male razorback suckers to spawning sites is influ- <br />encedmore by chronology of the hydrograph (flow <br />and temperature) than by uniform stimuli such as <br />photoperiod. Cuing to natural hydrographic and <br />thermal regimes in riverine environments may ef- <br />fectively congregate fish at spawning sites, thus <br />increasing the efficiency of successful spawning <br />within small populations. Razorback suckers in <br />Lake Mohave, Arizona, in the absence of riverine <br />cues, spawned between November and May <br />(Minckley 1983). Although there are differences <br />in the timing of razorback sucker spawning be- <br />tween the upper and lower Colorado River basins, <br />the reported water temperatures (10° and 15°C) at <br />peak spawning in the lower basin (Bozek et al. <br />1990) are similar to those of the upper basin (Tyus <br />1987; Tyus and Karp 1990). Thus, discharge cues <br />aze not needed to successfully reproduce, but in- <br />creased rates of discharge can initiate movement <br />and aggregate reproducing adults. The latter would <br />be important in maximizing reproductive success <br />in small, genetically isolated populations. The tim- <br />ing of reproduction is also important if floodplain <br />inundation optimizes survival of early life stages <br />of razorback suckers (Tyus and Karp 1990; Modde <br />1996; Modde et al. 1996). <br />Tyus and Karp (1990) identified the Yampa Riv- <br />er and Escalante (Jensen, Utah) spawning areas, <br />and Tyus (1987) suggested that spawning may also <br />occur near the mouth of the Duchesne River and <br />in Island Park. Telemetry from this study sup- <br />ported the concept that multiple spawning sites <br />exist, including the Yampa River near its conflu- <br />ence with the Green Rivet, the Escalante spawning <br />area, and possibly the lower portion of Island Park. <br />Although transmitter-implanted male razorback <br />suckers moved to the vicinity of the Duchesne Riv- <br />er, movement seemed to occur either before or <br />following spawning. However, capture data indi- <br />cated that some razorback suckers were collected <br />at the mouth of the Duchesne River during the <br />spawning period. Recapture data during the spring <br />suggested strong fidelity to the Escalante spawning <br />area. However, because of the small number of fish <br />at the Yampa River spawning site, we could not <br />determine fidelity to this azea by recapture data <br />alone. Telemetry data indicated that half of the six <br />males monitored through three spawning years <br />325 <br />were found in multiple spawning areas. One in- <br />dividual was initially caught (expressing milt) at <br />the Yampa River site yet, during the next two <br />spawning years, was located only at the Escalante <br />area. In addition to individuals using different <br />spawning sites among years, fish 181765 and <br />224B6B visited two sites during the same spawn- <br />ing period. Presence of adult male fish at multiple <br />spawning areas suggested a single spawning pop- <br />ulation in the middle Green River, with most in- <br />dividuals spawning within a single area and ad- <br />ditional spawning occurring at other locations. <br />Acknowledgments <br />Assistance in field data collection was provided <br />by T. Hatch, C. Flan, J. Rosendale, R. Small, S. <br />Persselin, and D. Beers. This study was supported <br />by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National <br />Park Service, and the Recovery Program for the <br />Endangered Fishes in the Upper Colorado River <br />Basin. S. Petersburg, G. Mueller, A. Scholz, and <br />R. Muth provided helpful comments on earlier <br />drafts of this manuscript. <br />References <br />Alt, K. T. 1977. Inconnu, Stenodus leucichthys, migra- <br />tion studies in Alaska, 1961-1974. Journal of the <br />Fisheries Research Board of Canada 16:695-719. <br />Andrews, E. D. 1986. Downstream effects of Flaming <br />Gorge Reservoir on the Green River, Colorado and <br />Utah. Geological Society of America Bulletin 97: <br />1012-1023. <br />Barton, B. A. 1980. Spawning migrations, age, and <br />growth, and summer feeding of white and longnose <br />suckers in an irrigation reservoir. Canadian Field- <br />Naturalist 94:300-304. <br />Biology Committee. 1995. 1995 stocking plan for ra- <br />zorback sucker in the middle Green River. Final <br />Report to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Recovery <br />Implementation Program for the Recovery of En- <br />dangered Fish Species in the Upper Colorado River <br />Basin, Denver. <br />Bozek, M. A., L. J. Paulson, and G. R. Wilde. 1990. <br />Effects of ambient Lake Mohave temperatures on <br />development, oxygen consumption, and hatching <br />success of the razorback sucker. Environmental Bi- <br />ology of Fishes 27:255-263. <br />Bulkley, R. V., and R. Pimentel. 1983. Temperature <br />preference and avoidance by adult razorback sucker. <br />Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 112: <br />601-607. <br />Irving, D. B., and B. D. Burdick. 1995. Reconnaissance <br />inventory and prioritization of existing and poten- <br />tial bottomlands in the upper Colorado River basin <br />1993-1994. Final Report to U.S. Fish and Wildlife <br />Service, Recovery Implementation Program for the <br />Endangered Fish Species in the Upper Colorado <br />River Basin, Denver. <br />