Laserfiche WebLink
INTRODUCED FISHES OF THE LOWER COLORADO 81 <br />j agricultural develop- ~ organic deposits along the channel and in backwaters of the river. A liberal <br />itivores indicated direct feeding from the <br />f d <br />t <br />h <br />through other direct ~ <br />ynd Burke 1977) r <br />e <br />s o <br />occurrence of sand in stomac <br />bottom. Amorphous detrital materials in stomachs of carp and channel catfish <br />. often included unicellular algae, some of which was likely recorded as phyto- <br /> plankton (Table 1). The high incidence of Asiatic clams, Corbicuia %/uminea, in <br />' the reach, and from <br />hi <br />l stomachs of these fishes, and field observation of carp feeding upon and among <br />robable use of pseudofeces of the mollusk (Prokopovich <br />di <br />i <br />t <br />l <br />~wever, t <br />s was rea <br />- <br />carp <br />Cyprinus carpio; es p <br />n <br />ca <br />ams, <br />c <br />1969) by the fishes as food. This material, bypassed by a clam when particulates <br />, <br />r~unctatus,• largemouth exceed its capacity for .ingestion, includes a large percentage of detritus, plus <br />in stomachs of sailfin molly and <br />it <br />t <br />D <br />,. hirus, where 11 to 50 <br />fishes were studied in r <br />us <br />e <br />organisms bound in a mucoid secretion. <br />mouthbrooder was associated with the high frequency of occurrence of benthic <br />i were obtained from (or epiphytic) algae, and in the case of the latter, with substantial amounts of <br />razed within beds of aquatic <br />often <br />h <br />fi <br />h <br />f <br />personnel near Davis g <br />es <br />s <br />ese <br />t <br />higher plant tissues. Both o <br />mined were caught by <br />ra petenense; flathead ! plants. <br />Although much of the algae eaten by fishes in the lower Colorado River could <br />rainbow trout contained <br />ms <br />it <br />h <br />f <br />nata/is; sailfin molly, <br />^~~uth <br />Chaenobryttus , <br />er <br />e <br />or ot <br />easily have been ingested while foraging <br />considerable volumes of C/adophora g/omerata, a large filamentous alga that <br />, <br />fish taken); and the formed a major component of organic drift observed and caught on nets near <br />be taken as an innate feeding response by <br />l <br />f <br />~:>m the reach below <br />~:h <br />L <br />cyanel/us; and gae may <br />ting a <br />Davis Dam. Dri <br />visually-oriented fishes such as hatchery-reared trout, or may be consumed <br />, <br />. <br />near Parker and/or indiscriminately by facultative planktivores such as threadfin shad and striped <br />eared to be true phytoplankters (desmids and <br />that a <br />i <br />l <br />l <br />!~ various seines were <br />~f food items through pp <br />es <br />spec <br />ga <br />mullet. Some a <br />some diatoms) were found in stomachs of the last two species (Table 1). <br />~rnmel, and hoop nets Zooplankton in stomachs of rainbow trout, threadfin shad, red shiner, and <br />ristics of limnetic popula- <br />t <br />h <br />d <br /> arac <br />e <br />s c <br />bluegill included cladocerans and copepo <br />resumably having been entrained through <br />rvoirs <br />Ri <br />d <br />»,ach contents under <br />ar <br />hs (e <br />carp) the ~ <br />g , p <br />ver rese <br />o <br />Lions in Colora <br />penstocks into the channel. Zooplankters in stomachs of carp, largemouth bass, <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />Stomachs were ex- green sunfish, and black crappie also included ostracods and thus included <br />trout and shad contained what <br />Onl <br />eans <br />t <br />i <br />~ <br />I pyloric regions, and <br />.r later identification y <br />. <br />ac <br />crocrus <br />near-bottom or benthic m <br />~ might be considered more than trace amounts of zooplankton. <br />. <br />c era removed in the { Benthic invertebrates were present in stomachs of essentially all fishes exam- <br />n larvae almost universally represented. Rainbow <br />ter <br />id di <br />hi <br />' <br />!rich tends to under- a <br />p <br />ronom <br />fined, with c <br />P trout from below Davis Dam ate about equal amounts of chironomid ap.d <br />~r~nce of small items. ~ simuliid dipteran larvae and also contained a substantial frequency of hydropsy- <br />ephemeropteran nymphs, <br />fed on chironomids <br />r <br />C <br />l <br />~_ssed as percentage, <br />estimated) ''points" , <br />p <br />a <br />arvae. <br />chid trichopteran <br />~ trichopteran larvae, and a few odonate naiads. The last three groups only oc- <br />~c-s of animals from s tarred in stomachs of fishes from below Parker Dam. Red shiners ate chirono- <br />low frequency of <br />Th <br />h <br />~eased apart in water <br />,nd Usinger (1956) e <br />opterans. <br />~ mids, and a few ephemeropterans and tric <br />occurrence of chironomids in channel catfish (5.1%) indicated little depend- <br />. <br />r;~~r crustaceans. ence on benthic insects. No other insect groups were used by channel catfish, <br />which is surprising in light of findings in other streams l e.g. Bailey and Harrison <br /> 1948). Yellow bullheads used chironomids extensively, but young flathead cat- <br /> <br />is of threadfin shad fish ate only large odonates and trichopterans. <br />Most mosquitofish examined had eaten tiny, soft-bodied larvae of chirono- <br />, <br />I Table 1 ), and was ~ mids, culicids, dixidsl?), and undetermined insect groups. About 43% fed on <br />and spiders) and aerial adults of aquatic <br />ants <br />ertebrates (aphids <br />l i <br />i <br />r detritus was identi- <br />~:-,crophytes <br />A small , <br />, <br />nv <br />a <br />terrestr <br />insects (included with terrestrial insects in Table 1 ). sailfin mollies did not feed <br />. <br />prance to gytjja-like on animal materials lsee, however, Harrington and Harrington 1961). <br />~--82823 <br />