Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> <br /> <br />384 Robert Rush Miller <br />of deep holes in the Mimbres River a local informant told Dr. Hubb <br />es) <br />that in the 1880's such holes (frequented elsewhere were numerous, that the stream had a more reliable and constant <br />flow, and that he caught many 6-inch "Gila trout," the local name of <br />this species. The terminus of the Mimbres was described in the 1850's <br />as comprising pools or lagoons, surrounded by willow thickets, and <br />4 to 6 miles above it was up to 21/2 feet deep and flowing at (during <br />summer) 21/2 miles per hour (Antisell,1857, p.176) . <br />Gila4 mohavensis (Snyder), Mohave chub.--This fish is endan- <br />gered.because its numbers, over almost all of its natural range in the <br />Mohave River, California (Fig. 1), have been severely reduced by <br />hybridization and competition with an introduced minnow, G. orcutti <br />(Hubbs and Miller, 1943, 1948, p. 41). The species forms a pure and <br />large population at only one locality in the basin, a spring-fed arti- <br />ficial pond, the site of a health resort, on the western side of Soda <br />(Dry) Lake; it was abundant thereon July 1, 1959. An attempt to <br />establish this fish in other suitable but fishless waters was made in. <br />1939 and 1940, and although the introduction was initially a success <br />in Sentenac Canyon (San Diego County, California) the population <br />died out there between 1957 and 1959. How long it will continue to <br />persist in the Mohave River basin is problematical. <br />Lepidomeda vittata Cope, Little Colorado spinedace.-This spe- <br />cies, endemic to the upper part of the Little Colorado River, Arizona, <br />has been collected only 3 times since 1873--once in 1938 and twice in <br />1939. It belongs to a unique, small group of New World minnows, con- <br />fined to the Colorado River system, that are peculiar in having <br />spinose dorsal and pelvic rays (Miller and Hubbs, 1960). Whether <br />the species still persists, in the face of competition with introduced <br />species and modification of its environment, is questionable (reser- <br />voirs have been built and fish toxin used in the main river since 1939; <br />see Hemphill, 1954). Since this statement was written, extensive ef- <br />forts to collect this fish during August 1960 resulted in the capture of <br />but a single specimen in Clear Creek, a tributary of the Little Colo- <br />rado River. <br />Catostomus microps Rutter, Modoc sucker.-This species was de- <br />'The reference of this species to Gila rather than to Siphateles results from <br />unpublished studies of the comparative ostedogY of the genus Gila and its rela- <br />tives by Teruya Uyeno (PhD. thesis, 1960, Univ. of Mich.). He regards Sipha- <br />teles as a synonym of Gila, 9 viewpoint with which I agree. <br /> <br />i <br />