My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7040
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7040
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:44 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:23:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7040
Author
Miller, R. R.
Title
Man and the Changing Fish Fauna of the American Southwest
USFW Year
1961
USFW - Doc Type
Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />382 Robert Rush Miller <br />exotics as Gambusia a. afinis, Micropterus salmoides, and the still <br />persistent carp. <br />Cyprinodon latifasciatus Garman, Parras pupfish.-This distinc- <br />tive species, like Stypodon signifer, once inhabited a spring or springs <br />near Parras, Coahuila, Mexico. It occurred there in 1880 and at least <br />until 1903, when George Hochderfer obtained 9 specimens (USNM <br />50970). It has not been taken since and is very likely extinct. The <br />probable causes of its extermination are given above under the ac- <br />count of Stypodon signif er. <br />. Gambusia gaigei Hubbs, Big Bend gambusia.-This species was <br />first discovered at Boquillas Spring, near the Rio Grande, Texas, in <br />1928, but became extinct there by 1954. It was more recently collected <br />at Graham Ranch Warm Springs. There, in 1954, nearly 95 per cent of <br />the population of Gambusia was G. gaigei, the remainder G. affinis; <br />in 1956, however, the proportions were reversed, so that the known <br />population of G. gaigei sank to a very, low level. The more widespread <br />and aggressive mosquitofish, G. affcnis, had probably been introduced <br />(Clark Hubbs and Springer, 1957, p. 305). The imminent danger of <br />extinction of the Big Bend gambusia was subsequently relieved by <br />action of the National Park Service, which eliminated the in- <br />troduced species and stocked the native one in other springs. How- <br />ever, on April 16, 1960, Clark Hubbs (in litt.) found the surviving <br />population of G. gaigei to be very small since Rio Grande species, in- <br />cluding G. affinis, had penetrated the waters reserved for the native <br />species, which is unable to compete successfully with them. In a <br />last-ditch attempt to save the Big Bend gambusia, Dr. Hubbs car- <br />ried back to Austin more than half of the population. It was esti- <br />mated by him that fewer than 24 individuals of the species existed <br />and that the wild population would become extinct by midsummer, <br />1960. It is hoped that several hundred individuals may be reared from <br />the brood stock returned to Austin and that Big Bend National Park <br />may successfully be restocked. The species was prematurely reported <br />to be extinct by Matthiessen (1959,p. 271). <br />Gila crassicauda (Baird and Girard), thicktail chub.-This spe- <br />cies, which reached a length of about I foot, formerly was common in <br />lowland waters of the Central Valley of California (including Clear <br />Lake and Coyote Creek, a southern tributary to San Francisco Bays) ; <br />`The supposed occurrence of the species in Salinas River, tributary to Mon- <br />terey Bay, is questionable (Clark Hubl@6 1947, p. 148). <br /> <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.