Laserfiche WebLink
166 <br />R ?1)1 <br />sucker larvae have failed to produce quantitative <br />data, and thus could only speculate on importance <br />of predation as a cause of mortality, A major prob- <br />lem has been detection of prey items in stomachs of <br />fishes that masticate or otherwise render foods vi- <br />?y? 'sually unrecognizable, or after digestion has pro- <br />ceeded for periods of more than a few hours (un- <br />publ. data). These difficulties must be resolved if <br />the role of predation is to be determined. The <br />former may be overcome by use of serological tech- <br />niques (Boreham & Ohiagu 1978, Engvall & Perl- <br />mann 1972, Heusser et al. 1981, Monroe 1985), but <br />even these methods may be time-limited by rapid <br />prey digestion (Theilacker et al. 1986) and thus <br />require close-order sampling. <br />Investigations to confirm fate of larval razorback <br />sucker in Lake Mohave have yet to be conducted, <br />but may be critical to management and recovery of <br />the species. If, for example, it were determined <br />that a significant reduction in predation pressure <br />on wild or reintroduced stocks would allow <br />establishment of self-perpetuating populations of <br />the native, then management activities might be <br />directed toward reduction of established popula- <br />tions of known predators. Ichthyocide reclamation <br />to remove catfishes from selected Arizona streams <br />and subsequent stocking of razorback suckers is an <br />example of how this management might be imple- <br />mented. Such an experiment may be necessary to <br />resolve the elusive question of why stocked juve- <br />nile razorback suckers have apparently realized <br />limited survival (Marsh 1987, unpubl. data) and, at <br />least circumstantially, would contribute toward ex- <br />plaining lack of recruitment in Lake Mohave and <br />elsewhere <br />The alternative of planting razorback suckers at <br />a stzeL e'EativeIy unmune to 'redation may succeed <br />in reestabhs ing it stocks, but still fail to msure <br />self peipeiuation if predation on larvae` prevents' <br />recruitment. nfortu -ately, reclamation is proba- <br />bly infeasible other than in local areas of reservoirs <br />and remaining mainstream habitat of the Colorado <br />River that comprise much of the original range of <br />the species. Eventual recovery of razorback sucker <br />and other imperiled big-river fishes of the South- <br />west may best be achieved in backwaters, oxbows, <br />and smaller tributary habitats amenable to substan- <br />tial, perhaps repeated, removal of non-native <br />fishes. <br />Acknowledgements <br />This work was funded in part by contracts to Ari- <br />zona State University from U.S. Fish and Wildlife <br />Service Region II, Office of Endangered Species, <br />Albuquerque, New Mexico; U.S. Bureau of Recla- <br />mation, Lower Colorado Regional Office, Boulder <br />City, Nevada; and Arizona Game and Fish Depart- <br />ment (AZGFD), Phoenix. Permits were issued by <br />U.S. National Park Service, Nevada Department <br />of Wildlife, and AZGFD. J. Brooks, T. Burke, <br />and W.L. Minckley participated in various aspects <br />of the studv; they and W.R. Courtenay, D.L. <br />Galat, and D. Papoulias reviewed the manuscript. <br />References cited <br />Allan, R.C. & D.L. Roden. 1978. Fish of Lake Mead and Lake <br />Mohave. Biol. Bull. No. 7, Nevada Department of Wildlife, <br />Reno. <br />Boreham, P.F.L. & C.E. Ohiagu. 1978. The use of serology in <br />evaluating invertebrate predator-prey relationships: a re- <br />view. Bull. Entomol. Res. 68: 171-194. <br />Chesson, J. 1983. The estimation and analysis of preference and <br />its relationship to foraging models. Ecology 64: 1297-1304. <br />Engvall, E. & P. Perlmann. 1978. Enzyme-linked immunosor- <br />bent assay, ELISA. J. Immunol. 109:129-135. <br />Heusser, C.H., J.W. Stocker & R.H. Gisler. 1981. Methods for <br />binding cells to plastic: application to solid phase immu- <br />noassays for cell-surface antigens. Meth. Enzymol. 73: 406- <br />417. <br />Holden, P.B. 1980. Xyrauchen texanus (Abbott) humpback <br />sucker. pp. 435. In: D.S. Lee, C.R. Gilbert, C.H. Hocutt, <br />R.E. Jenkins, D.E. McAllister & J.R. Stauffer (ed.) Atlas of <br />North American Freshwater Fishes, North Carolina State <br />Museum of Natural History, Raleigh. <br />Johnson, J.E. & J.N. Rinne. 1982. The endangered species act <br />and southwestern fishes. Fisheries 7: 1-10. <br />Langhorst, D.R. 1987. Larval razorback sucker, Xyrauchen <br />texanus, in Lake Mohave, AZ-NV. Proc. Desert Fishes <br />Council 17 (in press). <br />Lemly, A.D. 1985. Suppression of native fish populations by <br />green sunfish in first-order streams of piedmont North Car- <br />olina. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 114: 705-712. <br />Loftus, D.H. & P.F. Hulsman. 1986. Predation on larval lake <br />whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) and lake herring (C. ar- <br />tedii) by adult rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax). Can. J. Fish. <br />Aquat. Sci. 43: 812-818.