My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7173
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7173
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:45 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:23:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7173
Author
Miller, R. R.
Title
Is Our Native Underwater Life Worth Saving?
USFW Year
1963
USFW - Doc Type
National Parks Magazine
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PL.foj -pAi above (:om dodnrl, var.<e br Phil Douen <br />persons of their plans for specific treat- <br />ment of waters, much of the potential <br />danger to aquatic life in our rivers and <br />lakes could be alleviated. Fortunately <br />there are now two active groups in the <br />American Society of Ichthyologists and <br />Herpetologists to which these organi- <br />zations can turn for such information: <br />a Committee on Fish Conservation, <br />chaired by Carl L. Hubbs (Scripps In- <br />stitution of Oceanography, La Jolla, <br />California), and a Herpetological <br />Consen ation Committee, chaired by <br />Frederick R. Gehlbach (Museum of <br />Zooiory. University of Michigan. Ann <br />Arbor. Michigani. A list of rare, re- <br />stricted, and/or endangered species of <br />fishes, amphibians. and reptiles has <br />been compiled by these two committees <br />and is available for reference by local, <br />State, and federal agencies as well as <br />by private conservation organizations <br />and other interested persons. <br />An awareness of endangered kinds, <br />and an appreciation of the value of all <br />native wildlife-without undue em- <br />phasis on those offering food or sport <br />---could result in saving many aquatic <br />animals from needless extinction. I <br />have recently pointed Gut to the Ari- <br />zona Department of Fish and Game <br />that a peculiar, and now very rare, <br />minnow, the Little Colorado spinedace, <br />is nearing extinction in eastern Ari- <br />zona, and that it- continued existence <br />may well depend upon the activities of <br />this conservation group (Miller, 1963). <br />One way to save such animals, if non- <br />specific toxicant= absolutely must be <br />used, would be to remove a breeding <br />stock of the species prior to chemical <br />treatment, hold the animals during the <br />operation, and then reintroduce them <br />to their native stream. once the poison <br />has dissipated. This method could be <br />effective only if the habitat remained <br />sufficiently unmodified after the treat. <br />ment so as to support the species. <br />The de,elopment of specific toxicants <br />designed to eradicate certain non-native <br />fish, such as carp, is a step in the <br />right direction. The U. S. Fish and <br />Ti iidlife Service's Division of Sport <br />Fisheries is operating a laboratory at <br />La Crosse, R'isconsin, that is seeking <br />such compounds and is capable of per- <br />forming more than 600 bioassay tests <br />per week. One of the best and most <br />encouraging examples of the develop- <br />ment of a chemical for the specific <br />control of a destructive fish is the com- <br />pound used against the sea lamprey of <br />the Great Lakes (Applegate, Howell, <br />and Smith; 1956). However, even here <br />the selectivity in part depends on cum- <br />bersome. and costly logistics in applica- <br />tion. <br />A vigorous educational program un. <br />der-taken by conservation departments <br />through their popular magazines would <br />alleviate the undue pressure now <br />brought to bear on them by sportsmen. <br />Such pressure leads "biologists" to em- <br />ploy harsh and drastic management <br />methods rather than to develop the <br />sophisticated ones that are called for. <br />It is biologically crude, as well as un- <br />necessary, to demolish and upset whole <br />balances of aquatic communities, and <br />we must expect to suffer the conse- <br />quences of such programs if they are <br />not sharply curtailed. In the words of <br />Paul Sears (1957) : "The earth is fit <br />for (man) and he for it not only be- <br />cause of what he found here but of <br />ghat went on here during the millions <br />of years before his advent. Surely it <br />behooves him to think twice before <br />causing too much disruption." We al- <br />ready have enough trouble with pollu- <br />tion by other than fish managers. Let <br />them not pollute, too. <br />Provision for Consultation <br />A recent sign of awakening towards <br />some form of control in this direction <br />is the bill (H.R. 2867) introduced on <br />January 28, 1963, by Representative <br />John D. Dingell (Michigan). This <br />provides for advance consultation with <br />the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and <br />with State wildlife agencies before be- <br />ginning any federal program involving <br />the use of pesticides or other chemicals <br />designed for mass biological controls. <br />01 <br />NATIONAL PARKS MAGAMNE <br />The humpback sucker (xyrauchen texanus). <br />From the Green River in Hideout Canon. Utah, <br />July, 1959. Total length, 18 inches; weight, 2 pounds. <br />The humpbacl. chub (Gila cypha). <br />From the Green River near Hideout Canyon, Utah, <br />July, 1959. Total length, 13 inches.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.