My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7826
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7826
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:23:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7826
Author
Mueller, G.
Title
A Program for Maintaining the Razorback Sucker in Lake Mohave
USFW Year
1995
USFW - Doc Type
American Fisheries Society Symposium
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
130 <br />MUELLER <br />Some methods optimize production, whereas other <br />techniques produce fewer fish but focus on genetic <br />diversity. The following propagation methods have <br />been or currently are being tested. <br />(1) Backwaters were stocked with mature adults <br />from the reservoir prior to the spawning season. Adults <br />were stocked at a ratio of one female to two males. <br />Males were stocked in larger numbers because females <br />normally spawn with multiple males at one time <br />(Minckley 1973). Adults were recaptured and returned <br />to Lake Mohave following spawning. A different spawn- <br />ing group was used each year. <br />(2) Another approach was examined to reduce <br />spawner handling and stress associated with allowing <br />fish to spawn in the backwaters and eventually recap- <br />turing and returning them to the reservoir. Spawning <br />fish were collected from Lake Mohave in 1993, gametes <br />were stripped, eggs were fertilized, and fish were re- <br />turned to the reservoir. The egg contribution from each <br />female was fertilized by at least two males. About <br />250,000 eggs from 24 females and about 60 males were <br />collected; 200,000 were dispersed in Yuma Cove, and <br />the remainder were hatched in the laboratory for larval <br />research. Unfortunately, the reservoir dropped about 1 <br />m shortly after the eggs were distributed in Yuma Cove. <br />(3) Larvae are phototactic and can be captured easily <br />at night by using lights. Naturally spawned reservoir <br />larvae have been collected for a number of years using <br />handheld spotlights and small dip nets or light traps <br />(Minckley et al. 1991; Mueller et al. 1993). These tech- <br />niques are being refined to collect large numbers of <br />larval razorback suckers for stocking into the backwa- <br />ters. <br />(4) Dexter National Fish Hatchery is the USFWS <br />warmwater, endangered-fish culturing facility. The <br />hatchery maintains a broodstock of Lake Mohave ra- <br />zorback sucker and produces fish for scientific research <br />and stocking. The hatchery supplied 10,000, 6-cm (TL) <br />fish for Davis Cove on 28 June 1992. <br />All backwaters except Davis Cove were poisoned <br />to remove nonnative fish. Davis Cove was not poi- <br />soned due to its close proximity to a large public <br />marina and in order to test if razorback suckers <br />could survive in a cove where nonnative fish were <br />reduced but not eliminated. Here the nonnative fish <br />community was reduced using gill and trammel nets <br />and by electrofishing. <br />Stocking Criteria <br />Lake Mohave contains several piscivores, includ- <br />ing striped bass Morone saxatilis, largemouth bass <br />Micropterus salmoides, bluegill Lepomis macrochi- <br />rus, and channel catfish. The stocking-size criterion <br />was based on the assumption that most piscivores <br />would have difficulty consuming a 25-cm razorback <br />sucker. This criterion will be refined as survival <br />rates of recaptured fish are developed. Currently, <br />razorback suckers longer than 25 cm that are taken <br />from the rearing areas are tagged with PIT tags and <br />stocked directly into the reservoir. Smaller fish are <br />moved to a permanent backwater and allowed to <br />continue their growth. <br />Monitoring <br />Larval and juvenile fish are collected using lights <br />and small dip nets, light traps, small-mesh seines, <br />fish traps, small-mesh trammel nets, and electro- <br />fishing. Ephemeral backwaters and Davis Cove are <br />sampled bimonthly to monitor fish survival, growth, <br />and condition. Piscivorous fish collected in Davis <br />Cove during sampling events are removed. <br />Arizona State University has been monitoring the <br />reservoir's razorback sucker population for nearly <br />20 years. The reservoir is sampled specifically for <br />razorback suckers during spring and Thanksgiving <br />class breaks. This effort has been intensified during <br />the past 8 years to estimate the population size. <br />Sampling is conducted in March when spawners are <br />concentrated in shallow water and are vulnerable to <br />trammel nets, large beach seines, and electrofishing. <br />Usually 1,000 to 2,000 adults are collected and <br />tagged with PIT tags annually. The spring and fall <br />monitoring efforts are providing the information <br />required to determine the survival of backwater- <br />reared fish. <br />Results <br />Propagation and Rearing <br />In January 1991, 100 (33 females, 67 males) adult <br />razorback suckers were stocked into Yuma Cove <br />just prior to spawning season. Larvae were collected <br />during the spawn; however, for reasons unknown, <br />no young fish survived. A similar effort was at- <br />tempted in January 1992 with 88 adults (28 females <br />and 60 males), and 296 young fish were recovered <br />(Table 1). Juveniles collected in November 1992 <br />averaged 35.4 cm TL (maximum 39.1 cm). One <br />hundred fifty-three fish larger than 25 cm were <br />tagged with PIT tags and released in Lake Mohave; <br />the remainder (<25 cm) were placed in Davis Cove <br />to continue their growth. Fifteen juveniles were <br />sacrificed for genetic (mitochondrial DNA and al- <br />lozyme) analyses to determine the number of fe- <br />males that actually contributed to the 1992 year- <br />class. Results showed that although 28 females were <br />introduced, the 15 juveniles were produced by 5 <br />females, and 8 were produced by a single female <br />(T. Dowling, Arizona State University, personal <br />communication). <br />The 1993 fertilized egg experiment produced 17
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.