Laserfiche WebLink
AN AUGMENTATION PLAN FOR RAZORBACK SUCKER <br />response to the need to recover the razorback <br />sucker, as well as the remaining three Endangered <br />fishes of the main-stem upper Colorado River basin <br />(Colorado squawfish Ptychocheilus lucius, hump- <br />back chub Gila cypha, and bonytail G. elegans), a <br />multi-agency recovery program was established <br />among state and federal agencies and private inter- <br />est groups in the upper Colorado River basin to <br />accommodate water development and fish recovery <br />simultaneously (Wydoski and Hamill 1991). The <br />goal of this recovery program is to establish and <br />protect self-sustaining populations and natural hab- <br />itat of the razorback sucker (USFWS 1987). Among <br />several components of the program are habitat re- <br />habilitation, including minimum-flow requirements, <br />and artificial propagation. This paper outlines a <br />strategy to recover razorback sucker in the upper <br />Colorado River basin by enhancing habitat neces- <br />sary for recruitment and developing a population <br />augmentation program that includes a genetic man- <br />agement plan, a decision-making process to deter- <br />mine when stocking is necessary, and the use of <br />chemical imprinting to increase management op- <br />tions following stocking. <br />The initial step in the development of a recovery <br />plan is the identification of population units of con- <br />cern. A baseline genetic survey that included all <br />known wild and captive populations of razorback <br />sucker was conducted throughout its range in both <br />upper and lower Colorado River basins. Two meth- <br />ods of genetic analysis were chosen-mitochondrial <br />DNA, by means of an analysis of restriction frag- <br />ment length polymorphisms, and allozyme varia- <br />tion, by means of starch gel protein electrophoresis. <br />Preliminary results support provisional division of <br />the upper Colorado River basin razorback sucker <br />populations into Green River, Colorado River, and <br />San Juan River stocks. In addition to genetic find- <br />ings, behavioral and distributional data support this <br />hypothesis. <br />The razorback sucker occupying the Green River <br />represents the largest population of this species <br />occupying riverine habitat (Minckley et al. 1991). <br />Lanigan and Tyus (1989), assuming no recruitment <br />or tag loss over a nine-year period, estimated the <br />middle Green River razorback sucker population to <br />be 948 fish (95% confidence interval, 758-1,138). <br />Using the same data, plus 4 years of additional data, <br />Modde, Burnham, and Wick (unpublished data) <br />estimated the population to be 524 fish (95% con- <br />fidence interval 351-696). The latter study reported <br />limited recruitment, an adult survival rate of 71%, <br />and an unspecified rate of tag loss. <br />The razorback sucker in the middle Green River <br />103 <br />has been observed at two spawning sites (Figure 1), <br />one approximately 16 km below Split Mountain <br />Canyon (defined as the Jensen site by Tyus and <br />Karp 1990) and the other at the mouth of the <br />Yampa River just before it enters the Green River. <br />During the spawning season, razorback suckers can <br />be collected regularly at both spawning sites. Some <br />of these fish migrate 30-100 km and show fidelity to <br />selected spawning sites in the Green and Yampa <br />rivers in Colorado and Utah (Holden and Stalnaker <br />1975; Tyus 1987; Tyus and Karp 1990). Previous <br />investigators have speculated that homing of razor- <br />back suckers to these sites may be related to natal <br />imprinting (Wick et al. 1982; Tyus and Karp 1990). <br />Suspected larval razorback suckers were col- <br />lected below the two spawning sites by Tyus (1987) <br />and again in 1992, 1993, and 1994 by the U.S. Fish <br />and Wildlife Service (D. Snyder and R. Muth, Lar- <br />val Fish Laboratory, Colorado State University, <br />personal communication). In 1993, 700 suspected <br />larval razorback suckers were collected between the <br />known spawning sites and the Colorado River arm <br />of Lake Powell (E. Wick, National Park Service, <br />personal communication). The dates when these <br />fish were collected and their sizes suggested they <br />could have originated from the middle Green River, <br />as well as other unknown spawning sites in the <br />lower Green River. Despite the relative abundance <br />of the razorback sucker larvae in the Green and <br />Colorado rivers, less than 10 juvenile razorback <br />suckers have been collected in the upper Colorado <br />River basin during the last 10 years (near the "Min- <br />eral Bottoms" by the Utah Division of Wildlife <br />Resources in 1991, and on the Ouray National <br />Wildlife Refuge in 1993). <br />In the upper Colorado River, razorback sucker <br />adults were commonly collected during the 1970s <br />(Minckley et al. 1991). Despite extensive sampling, <br />very few adult razorback suckers have been col- <br />lected in the upper Colorado River main stem since <br />1986, and only seven razorback sucker adults have <br />been collected from riverine habitats since 1988 <br />(McAda et al. 1994). Recently a gravel pit near <br />Grand Junction, Colorado, was found to support <br />several hundred razorback suckers (F. Pfeifer, U.S. <br />Fish and Wildlife Service, personal communica- <br />tion). However, genetic analysis (A. Echelle, D. <br />Philipp, and F. Allendorf, Recovery Program Ge- <br />netics Advisory Panel, personal communication) <br />personal communication) of these fish indicated <br />that most were either the offspring of a limited <br />number of parents that spawned in the pond during <br />the high-flow years of 1983 and 1984 or the off- <br />spring of hybridization between razorback sucker