My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9643 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
9643 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:48 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:23:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
9643
Author
Seener, J. W.
Title
Inbreeding Depression and the Survival of Zoo Populations
USFW Year
n.d.
USFW - Doc Type
209-217
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
86 CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME <br />tified fishes. Only one redear sunfish took a juvenile shad, but black crappie ate <br />them frequently, along with red shiner. Striped bass ate threadfin shad, rainbow <br />trout, crayfish, centrarchids, carp, tiger salamander, Ambvstoma tigrinum, and <br />unidentified animal material (Edwards 1974). The salamander is a common bait <br />animal along the Colorado River (Minckley 1971 b); and a single specimen also <br />was eaten by a channel catfish (Table 1 ). <br />Percentages of empty stomachs in fishes of the lower Colorado River were <br />related to principal food habits. No empty stomachs were found among de- <br />tritivores and facultative planktivores. Species that depended upon a broader <br />food base, including significant frequencies of benthic invertebrates, also had <br />relatively low percentages of empty stomachs. Large piscivores tended to have <br />a high incidence of empty stomachs (e.g. flathead catfish, 39.1%). Edwards <br />(1974) reported 45% of 100 storachs of adult striped bass as empty. Small- <br />mouth bass, warmouth, and green sunfish also had an incidence of empty <br />stomachs that exceeded 20%, but largemouth bass displayed a wider food base <br />and all but 11.6% contained foods. <br />SPATIAL VARIATION <br />Trophic structure within the fish community of the lower Colorado River <br />differs substantially in different reaches of stream. Near Davis Dam, waters of <br />the upstream reservoir (Lake Mohave) provide a major proportion of basic <br />foodstuffs. Substantial amounts of plankton and detritus pass through the dam <br />and this is reflected in a large proportion of filter-feeding invertebrates (e.g. <br />simuliids) in stomachs of fishes from that reach. Threadfin shad also drawn <br />through the dam form a major portion of the food supply for striped bass <br />(Edwards 1974), and likely for larger rainbow trout. Cold water resulting from <br />hypolimnic releases from Davis Dam exclude many temperate (and obviously <br />tropical) species of fishes from that area. Primary production is relatively high, <br />since aquatic vegetation is abundant (no quantitative data available), but essen- <br />tially no fishes are present to utilize that level in the food web. <br />Downstream in Topock Gorge, deep, swift areas continue to be influenced by <br />hypolimnic water from Lake Mohave. A few major backwaters provide habitat <br />for temperate fishes. It seems likely that this reach is relatively devoid of foods <br />h for piscivores, since red shiners were rare and threadfin shad almost non-existent <br />(Minckley 1979). <br />Lake Havasu is a relatively stable, mainstream reservoir that differs greatly <br />". from the remainder of the reach under consideration. Few stomachs of fishes <br />were examined from the lake (none of those presented in Table 1), but food <br />relations seemed similar to those described by Rinne, Minckley, and Berseil <br />(1981 ) from reservoirs in central Arizona. Fishes were distributed relative to <br />t their food supplies: planktivorous threadfin shad were most abundant near nutri- <br />ent inputs, thus near phyto- and zooplankton concentrations, and piscivorous <br />T largemouth bass tended to be near threadfin shad. Benthic predators were more <br />generally distributed within the reservoirs, in keeping with a more general distri- <br />bution of benthic invertebrates. Zooplankton was not studied in Lake Havasu, <br />but Chlorophyll a concentrations were highest near nutrient inputs at the upper- <br />most end of the lake and in the Bill Williams River arm (Portz 1973, Minckley <br />1979). Benthic invertebrates in Lake Havasu were also similar in diversity and <br />general abundance to those elsewhere in low desert impoundments (Rinne el <br />at. 1.961), with fev, <br />ley 1979, Cowell <br />sediments (Schulti <br />invertebrates were <br />populations in the <br />sunfish, at freque <br />qualitative examir <br />Epilimnetic pen <br />stream, thus enhe <br />Havasu. Particuia', <br />benthic animals, <br />Macrophytes, ber, <br />diet of all but ce <br />derived in part frc <br />and allochthonou <br />frequencies, espe <br />consisting mostly <br />diet of all specie <br />were broadly rep <br />eaten by speciali <br />parts of their diet <br />tion of SmallMOL <br />fishes were impc <br />and flathead catf <br />food web of the <br />fishes most frequ <br />ley 1979). Othe <br />part secondary <br />In the lowerrr <br />molly, striped n <br />from upstream, <br />part from dimim <br />these fishes to r <br />temperature ups <br />mouthbrooders, <br />mullet, undoubt <br />Although the <br />habits of intro& <br />those of tie sa <br />1966). Many of <br />insects and olig <br />high-density, IT <br />new fish fauna <br />populations m< <br />pear. <br />The food wE <br />Fishes in othe
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.