Laserfiche WebLink
m <br />rn?? <br />1. 42, No. 4 <br />ed to be in <br />W ?<< / <br />f t'd k l& <br />J <br />6-u _-,ta Fs-e- m <br />I q I? -;Z-- <br />EARLY DEVELOPMENT OF THE RAZORBACK SUCKER, <br />XYRA UCHEN TEXANUS (ABBOTT) <br />Teter) S?;1.), <br />he spav.1i- <br />1 when; a <br />-ipe M-'eS <br />the pr ?. <br />cm). <br />and d_ ,11 <br />here t <br />prim: <br />Tres re. j, <br />1 `tem <br />are <br />'rent, ,l <br />ab 1 <br />in a <br />I m <br />3ut t <br />ut ar, <br />the t <br />n, t. <br />fin. <br />e st: <br />'hei;- <br />reci. I <br />2011 L <br />'ish ' <br />W. L. Minckley' and Eric S. Gustafson' <br />ABsT ACT.- Fertilized ova of razorback sucker, Xyrauchen texanus, were adhesive for 3 to 4 hours after fertiliza- <br />tion. Cleavage was completed at 24 hours, gastrulation occurred at 34 hours, and blood circulation was established at <br />117 hours. Hatching occurred from 5.2 to 5.5 days after fertilization. Larvae were from 6.8 to 7.3 mm TL at hatch- <br />ing. Yolk was assimilated at 13 days (10 mm TL). All fins were formed and had ossified rays at 64 days (27 mm TL). <br />The unique nuchal keel appeared about 200 days after fertilization. <br />The razorback sucker, Xyrauchen texanus <br />(Abbott), is endemic to the Colorado River <br />basin. As with much of the southwestern ich- <br />thyofauna (Pfister 1981), it is declining in <br />abundance (Minckley 1983). A program was <br />commenced in 1974 to develop means of <br />propagating the species (Toney 1974) and to <br />delineate certain aspects of its life history. <br />We studied embryological, larval, and juve- <br />nile development of the species in 1974-75. <br />Although our data are somewhat outdated in <br />light of recent studies of catostomid larvae <br />(reviewed by Fuiman and Witman 1979), al- <br />most nothing has appeared on the early life <br />history of this unique species. Winn and <br />Miller (1954) presented a key to postlarval <br />-fishes of the lower Colorado River basin that <br />"included photographs and some descriptions <br />of young X. texanus. A photograph by <br />Douglas (1952: Fig. 3) was reidentified by <br />Winn and Miller as speckled dace (Rhi- <br />nichthys osculus [Girard]) rather than X. tex- <br />nus. The present paper thus describes and <br />gures early life-history stages of the razor- <br />?boratory-reared k sucker as determined from hatchery-and <br />11 individuals. <br />METHODS <br />Initial information on hatchery propaga- <br />on and rearing of razorback suckers origi- <br />nated from adult fish seined near Cotton- <br />wood Cove in Lake Mohave, Arizona <br />'Nevada, in winter 1974, and was compiled <br />'Department of Zoology, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287. <br />by personnel at Willow Beach National Fish <br />Hatchery (in part, Toney 1974). Eggs were <br />stripped from females and fertilized, and de- <br />veloping young were initially housed in an <br />indoor raceway at a mean water temperature <br />of 14 C, then transferred 13 days post- <br />hatching to an outdoor raceway where water <br />temperature averaged 15 C. Samples were <br />preserved daily in 10 percent formalin during <br />the first month, and intermittently thereafter. <br />Late postlarval and juvenile phases described <br />below are based on the 1974 cohort. <br />Additional adults were trammel netted <br />from below Hoover Dam and in the vicinity <br />of Carp Cove in Lake Mohave in March- <br />April 1975. Most males were in active <br />spawning condition, but females were either <br />spent or not yet mature. Suitable females <br />were interperitonealy injected with human <br />chorionic gonadotropin, which induced <br />oocyte maturation. A few hours after in- <br />jection about 5,000 eggs were stripped from <br />a single female and immediately fertilized <br />with sperm of two males, as has been ob- <br />served in nature (Douglas 1952). It is notable <br />that water-hardened eggs obtained from <br />naturally-matured females in 1974 were 2.9 <br />mm diameter, but comparable ova obtained <br />from hormone-induced maturation were 1.8 <br />mm diameter. This disparity is far greater <br />than has before been recorded in catostomid <br />ova diameters (Fuiman and Trojnar 1980). <br />We assume it resulted from precipitous mat- <br />uration after hormone injection, but have no <br />553 <br />1101- 6"J LAStU i NAIL/DIes71 41 - Sn. So.