d during annual March
<br />release year includes
<br />002 Combined
<br />4 30
<br />4 23
<br />3 33
<br />15 115
<br />21 133
<br />4 37
<br />20 89
<br />22 68
<br />17 45
<br />1 1
<br />0
<br />III 574
<br />in objective of the
<br />termine the number
<br />ach adult size after
<br />d utilizing an alter-
<br />fish (i.e., per unique
<br />tse and at just one
<br />Liltiple recaptures of
<br />not result in addi-
<br />Actual age at re-
<br />)n mixing at rearing
<br />age at release into
<br />the number of years
<br />it VBG curve is
<br />0-01,
<br />(asymptotic length
<br />wth coefficient de-
<br />iptotic length is ap-
<br />ge at length 0) were
<br />ne in Microsoft Ex-
<br />A-squared residuals
<br />le growth rates and
<br />Iinckley 1983; Mc-
<br />A thus, gender-spe-
<br />ivenile or unknown
<br />cker database con-
<br />mpture or recapture
<br />lril 2002. After the
<br />)er recorded twice)
<br />57,778 release re-
<br />(Table 1). Also, 9
<br />REPATRIATION TO CONSERVE IMPERILED FISH
<br />551
<br />TABLE 2.-Annual, single-census population estimates (N*, Chapman modification of the Peterson method; Seber
<br />1973) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of repatriated razorback suckers from collection data acquired during annual
<br />March censuses in Lake Mohave, Arizona-Nevada, 1999-2002. Abbreviations are as follows: M = number of repatriated
<br />fish captured the first year, C = number of repatriated fish captured the following year, and R = total number of
<br />repatriated fish captured in both the first and following year. Also shown are poststocking survival estimates for repa-
<br />triated razorback suckers based on N* and the number of fish released.
<br /> Number of Survival
<br />Year N* 95% Cl M C R fish releaseda (%)
<br />2002 1,335 449-4,804 105 62b 4 57,778 2
<br />2001 1,813 835-4,113 153 105 8 46,999 4
<br />2000 2,494 845-9,033 80 153 4 39,709 6
<br />1999 1,017 418-2,700 87 80 6 23,479 4
<br />a Each number is a cumulative number of fish released based on data from repatriates released
<br />before March 1 of the population estimate (N*) year (e.g., in 2002, the number 57,778 represents
<br />fish released from 1992 to February 28, 2002).
<br />b The 2003 data were reported by definition of C
<br />captures were removed because no corresponding
<br />release records were found, leaving 813 capture or
<br />recaptures-specifically, 132 recaptures and 681
<br />captures (i.e., unique records of fish capture).
<br />Thus, nearly 99% (N = 57,097) of the released
<br />fish had unknown fates.
<br />Analyses of population abundance and survival
<br />estimates used only capture and recapture records
<br />from March censuses (N = 579). For all analyses,
<br />we removed 25 records of recapture from the same
<br />census and 5 capture records without release data.
<br />The remaining 549 records represented 497 unique
<br />captures and 52 recaptures. Two capture records
<br />could not be used in Program MARK because re-
<br />lease and capture year were the same.
<br />Annual single-census population estimates were
<br />calculated for only 4 years (1999-2002; Table 2)
<br />because the probability of a biased population es-
<br />timate significantly increases as the number of re-
<br />captures decreases. In our study, only one of the
<br />four estimates was based on more than seven re-
<br />captures whereas two estimates were based on four
<br />(a recommended minimum; Ricker 1975). Seber
<br />(1973) concluded there is a 95% likelihood that
<br />bias is negligible on estimates based on at least
<br />seven recaptures. The 2002 estimate of 1,335 fish
<br />is approximately 53% less than the estimate gen-
<br />erated in 2000, both estimates based on only four
<br />recaptures (Table 2).
<br />Fish that met the size-at-release target of 301-
<br />350 mm TL represented only 19-25% of the total
<br />number of repatriates released, whereas 71-77%
<br />of the total was 300 mm or less (Table 3). We
<br />found that size-class significantly (log-linear anal-
<br />ysis: AX2 = 76.35, df = 8, P < 0.01) interacted
<br />with capture status, demonstrating the effect of
<br />size-class on survivorship, assuming that capture
<br />rates for all size-classes would be similar 4 years
<br />after release (Table 4). In addition, a significant
<br />interaction between census year and capture status
<br />(log-linear analysis: AX2 = 12.63, df = 9, P <
<br />0.01) indicated a lack of agreement between years,
<br />and a significant interaction between size-class and
<br />year (log-linear analysis: 0X2 = 210.92, df = 12,
<br />P « 0.01) indicated that the three size-classes
<br />were not released in equal proportions over the
<br />study period.
<br />Program MARK estimated first-year survivor-
<br />ship of a 350-mm fish to be 2.5 times greater than
<br />for a 300-mm fish (Figure 1). Low recapture and
<br />survival rates resulted in some parameters being
<br />impossible to estimate for models with as few as
<br />nine parameters. However, all models that includ-
<br />ed length at release as a covariate had a better fit
<br />than those without length (Table 4). In addition,
<br />among various models that incorporated length at
<br />release as a covariate, parameter estimates of first-
<br />year survival were similar, which produced a ro-
<br />bust parameter estimate that linked size at release
<br />and first-year survivorship.
<br />The VBG curve analysis included all of the
<br />unique capture data (N = 681) minus fish with
<br />missing length data or unspecified gender, for a
<br />total of 545 fish. Average total length at release
<br />was 287 mm (SD = 46, range 96-555) for all
<br />repatriated fish (N = 57,689) and 320 mm (SD =
<br />51, range = 169-563) for captured repatriates. Of
<br />the captured fish, females at release average 321
<br />mm (SD = 84, range = 169-500) and males were
<br />313 mm (SD = 49, range = 175-563), a 3% size
<br />difference, but their average size at capture dif-
<br />fered by 13%, females averaging 557 rum (SD =
<br />56, range = 356-670) and males 487 mm (SD =
<br />77, range = 298-672). Overall growth generally
<br />was rapid for both females and males after initial
<br />release, and growth was asymptotic within ap-
|