Laserfiche WebLink
d during annual March <br />release year includes <br />002 Combined <br />4 30 <br />4 23 <br />3 33 <br />15 115 <br />21 133 <br />4 37 <br />20 89 <br />22 68 <br />17 45 <br />1 1 <br />0 <br />III 574 <br />in objective of the <br />termine the number <br />ach adult size after <br />d utilizing an alter- <br />fish (i.e., per unique <br />tse and at just one <br />Liltiple recaptures of <br />not result in addi- <br />Actual age at re- <br />)n mixing at rearing <br />age at release into <br />the number of years <br />it VBG curve is <br />0-01, <br />(asymptotic length <br />wth coefficient de- <br />iptotic length is ap- <br />ge at length 0) were <br />ne in Microsoft Ex- <br />A-squared residuals <br />le growth rates and <br />Iinckley 1983; Mc- <br />A thus, gender-spe- <br />ivenile or unknown <br />cker database con- <br />mpture or recapture <br />lril 2002. After the <br />)er recorded twice) <br />57,778 release re- <br />(Table 1). Also, 9 <br />REPATRIATION TO CONSERVE IMPERILED FISH <br />551 <br />TABLE 2.-Annual, single-census population estimates (N*, Chapman modification of the Peterson method; Seber <br />1973) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of repatriated razorback suckers from collection data acquired during annual <br />March censuses in Lake Mohave, Arizona-Nevada, 1999-2002. Abbreviations are as follows: M = number of repatriated <br />fish captured the first year, C = number of repatriated fish captured the following year, and R = total number of <br />repatriated fish captured in both the first and following year. Also shown are poststocking survival estimates for repa- <br />triated razorback suckers based on N* and the number of fish released. <br /> Number of Survival <br />Year N* 95% Cl M C R fish releaseda (%) <br />2002 1,335 449-4,804 105 62b 4 57,778 2 <br />2001 1,813 835-4,113 153 105 8 46,999 4 <br />2000 2,494 845-9,033 80 153 4 39,709 6 <br />1999 1,017 418-2,700 87 80 6 23,479 4 <br />a Each number is a cumulative number of fish released based on data from repatriates released <br />before March 1 of the population estimate (N*) year (e.g., in 2002, the number 57,778 represents <br />fish released from 1992 to February 28, 2002). <br />b The 2003 data were reported by definition of C <br />captures were removed because no corresponding <br />release records were found, leaving 813 capture or <br />recaptures-specifically, 132 recaptures and 681 <br />captures (i.e., unique records of fish capture). <br />Thus, nearly 99% (N = 57,097) of the released <br />fish had unknown fates. <br />Analyses of population abundance and survival <br />estimates used only capture and recapture records <br />from March censuses (N = 579). For all analyses, <br />we removed 25 records of recapture from the same <br />census and 5 capture records without release data. <br />The remaining 549 records represented 497 unique <br />captures and 52 recaptures. Two capture records <br />could not be used in Program MARK because re- <br />lease and capture year were the same. <br />Annual single-census population estimates were <br />calculated for only 4 years (1999-2002; Table 2) <br />because the probability of a biased population es- <br />timate significantly increases as the number of re- <br />captures decreases. In our study, only one of the <br />four estimates was based on more than seven re- <br />captures whereas two estimates were based on four <br />(a recommended minimum; Ricker 1975). Seber <br />(1973) concluded there is a 95% likelihood that <br />bias is negligible on estimates based on at least <br />seven recaptures. The 2002 estimate of 1,335 fish <br />is approximately 53% less than the estimate gen- <br />erated in 2000, both estimates based on only four <br />recaptures (Table 2). <br />Fish that met the size-at-release target of 301- <br />350 mm TL represented only 19-25% of the total <br />number of repatriates released, whereas 71-77% <br />of the total was 300 mm or less (Table 3). We <br />found that size-class significantly (log-linear anal- <br />ysis: AX2 = 76.35, df = 8, P < 0.01) interacted <br />with capture status, demonstrating the effect of <br />size-class on survivorship, assuming that capture <br />rates for all size-classes would be similar 4 years <br />after release (Table 4). In addition, a significant <br />interaction between census year and capture status <br />(log-linear analysis: AX2 = 12.63, df = 9, P < <br />0.01) indicated a lack of agreement between years, <br />and a significant interaction between size-class and <br />year (log-linear analysis: 0X2 = 210.92, df = 12, <br />P « 0.01) indicated that the three size-classes <br />were not released in equal proportions over the <br />study period. <br />Program MARK estimated first-year survivor- <br />ship of a 350-mm fish to be 2.5 times greater than <br />for a 300-mm fish (Figure 1). Low recapture and <br />survival rates resulted in some parameters being <br />impossible to estimate for models with as few as <br />nine parameters. However, all models that includ- <br />ed length at release as a covariate had a better fit <br />than those without length (Table 4). In addition, <br />among various models that incorporated length at <br />release as a covariate, parameter estimates of first- <br />year survival were similar, which produced a ro- <br />bust parameter estimate that linked size at release <br />and first-year survivorship. <br />The VBG curve analysis included all of the <br />unique capture data (N = 681) minus fish with <br />missing length data or unspecified gender, for a <br />total of 545 fish. Average total length at release <br />was 287 mm (SD = 46, range 96-555) for all <br />repatriated fish (N = 57,689) and 320 mm (SD = <br />51, range = 169-563) for captured repatriates. Of <br />the captured fish, females at release average 321 <br />mm (SD = 84, range = 169-500) and males were <br />313 mm (SD = 49, range = 175-563), a 3% size <br />difference, but their average size at capture dif- <br />fered by 13%, females averaging 557 rum (SD = <br />56, range = 356-670) and males 487 mm (SD = <br />77, range = 298-672). Overall growth generally <br />was rapid for both females and males after initial <br />release, and growth was asymptotic within ap-