Laserfiche WebLink
TABLE 1. Distribution of WUA (m2i km) for adult small- <br />mouth bass at various depth-velocity combinations (data <br />extracted from table I of Bovee 1978). <br /> Velocity (m/s) <br />Depth (m) 0.15.-0-30 0.30-0.45 0.45-0.60 <br />0.30-0.45 15 14 <br />0.45-0.60 .17 15 21 <br />0.60-0.75 17 15 6 <br />0.75-0.90 11 44 63 <br />0.90-1.05 15 15 9 <br />are biologically equal and Provide similar production rates <br />unless each is an ex(r( t replica of the other unit. If each unit of <br />WUA is biologically identical, a prediction of standing stock of <br />fishes as a result of flow alteration may be ossi le /However, in <br />the present form of calculations in PHABSIM, several combina- <br />tions of depth, velocity. and substrate can give the same antrnmt <br />of WUA, none of which may support a similar fish biomass We <br />nave extracted data trom Bovee (1978) in Table I to show that at <br />least live different combinations of depth and velocity provide <br />the same amount of WUA (15m2lkni) for adult smallnu?uth <br />bass in a stream. A lack of correlation between WUA and fish <br />biomass may in part result from treating each habitat unit as <br />F.fjects of Outliers on Relationship of LL'UA and Biomass <br />The relationship between fish biomass (kilograms per hec <br />tare) and WUA (expressed as percent of total area) is used in <br />some investi ations. It is also weak and of uestiona <br />relation. or example, of the 20 correlations presented by <br />Orth and hlaughan (1982), 14 (70%) were not significant (P > <br />0.05). Examination of these reported relationships shows that in <br />most cases only two or three effective data points existed (a <br />cluster of points near the origin and one or two extreme values). <br />A cluster of points is equivalent to only one effective data point <br />in the determination of the slope of the regression line. All data <br />points should neigh equal) in determining a regression line <br />(Draper and Smith 1979 Spurious correlations and therefore <br />questionable conclusions can result when regressions are based <br />The following examples will illustrate the influence of <br />outliers on habitat relationships and subsequent interpretations. <br />Removal of single outliers from the central stoneroller summer <br />(X = 42.0, Y = 51.8) and fall (X = 42.9, Y = 17:7) data sets <br />reduced the reported significant correlations (P < 0.01) from <br />0.835 to 0:61 for the summer and from 0.737 to 0.416 for the <br />fall, both correlations became nrnnignifir`ant (P > 0 05) A7 <br />therefore consider the original interpretation that physical <br />habitat limits hoptilation of central stoneroller to h sus (`c't <br />On the other hand, rcn?oval of oullicrs front five spring central <br />stonerollev tlal7i sets ( t = 47.2. 40.0, t' 0.9,, 1. 1) incri-w,ctl <br />the correlation from 0.159 (P > 0.05) to 0.892 (P < 0.01). Note <br />that these are high values of WUA associated with low values of <br />biomass (kilograms per hectare) and that their removal in no <br />way biases the relationships that are assumed in IF1M. Using the <br />same logic the original interpretation that the physical habitat <br />did not limit the central stoneroller population becomes erron- <br />eous. Similarly, the removal of a single outlier (X = 70.9. Y = <br />0) from the adult smalbnouth bass summer data set increased <br />the reported correlation from 0,423 (P > 0,05) to 0,857 (f <br />changes may not result in corresponding changes in twal <br />abundance of species life stage and should not he interpreted as <br />such. The study also indicates, at the lead, that the a\ailability <br />of usable area may not ha\e an immediate regulatory efletr ,it <br />the population. In application of IFIAI, ho'.tever. it is ilalplicill; <br />assumed that such chances \\ ill occur in filch o Iulations a, a <br />result of flow alteraholls. Il Ollr Vlt't'., itltt,,llra[nrs Silwll i <br />attempt to relate changes in physical habitat in terms rl thril <br />effects on the standing styrck (abundance) in a stream as a k, hi-le <br />rather than in temporary redistribution (if a scynu nt n1 the li II <br />o ulation in a stretch ill a sit-Call), <br />References <br />nOVEE, K. D. 1978. The iecrcntental method of assessing habitat Pulent:al ;ur <br />eoolwater species, with management implications, p. 3411-14o. Ill R. L. <br />Kendall led. I Selected c+urln ater fishes of Nooh :America. Ain. I W) Soc <br />Spec. Publ. No. 11 <br />1982. A guide to dream habitat analysis using the L'Is!rcmn Flu« <br />Incremental D1ethodology. United State,. Fish and 'A ildlife Sen i:e <br />Biological Smites I'lot•I I'll, Coulwralivc In,'rranl I L w Scl•ice GIvup. <br />Inslreant Flom Infonn;ili ,r, I';qut Numlxr I?. I \'.;i !;nS S1.'.•!n 21?p <br />11RAI'I.R, N. R., ANU 11. t'•tl l II 1'179. Applied ril'+?'?i?r::nr:rl'. i•. !u?! •',I Ir!'n <br />Wiley R( Suns. I oc.. Pint 1 otl,. NY. 10911 <br />EMERY. A. R. 1973. Plchminan cumparisocs of day 7uld nigh! hal'its `r <br />freshwater lisll in Onruio Likes. J. I Ish. Res. no;ud I. ul. ;11: 7(11-'7,1 <br />FRASER. J. C. 1972. Rrgulatcd discharge and the stream _ntin?nn:eat. <br />p. 263-286. ht R. J Oglcshy. C. A. Carlson. and J. A NIct ann 1H.I <br />River ecology and man. Academic Press, tie" Yvik. NY. <br />FRASER, D. F., ANU E E. ENnioNs. 1984. Behasioral response of tltacknnse <br />dace (RhiaicJult)a utrantlito R) %;wing densities of Predatory creek chute <br />(Sernotilusatr(-t.,ut('ttlnnts). Can. J. Fish. Ayuat. Sci. 41:3b4-.370. <br />GORE, J, A., ANn R. D- Jur)%-. JR. 1981. Predictise modus of benthic <br />macroinvertebra,,e densuy For use in instream ll(,a studies and reguLnrd <br />, <br />flow manapanivnl. Clio J I'Irh, Aqt n, 5!'I )b' I W 070 <br />830 Can. J. Fob ,,law. St I_ IN. 42. 1'=?`