My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7389
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7389
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:45 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:22:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7389
Author
Marsh, P. C.
Title
Razorback Sucker Management in Arizona.
USFW Year
1985.
USFW - Doc Type
181.
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IY1 ? t <br />RAZORBACK SUCKER MANAGEMENT IN ARIZONA <br />Razorback sucker management in Arizona began in 1981 with a 10-year <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />memorandum of understanding between Arizona Game and Fish Department <br />(GFD) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Production is at Dexter <br />National Fish Hatchery, New Mexico, with grow-out to larger sizes both <br />there and at GFD Page Springs Hatchery. By 1985, more than 10 million <br />juveniles, fingerlings, and fry have been stocked at 28 sites on the <br />Gila, Salt, and Verde rivers and their tributaries. Stocking sites and <br />downstream riverine reaches have been monitored annually, and reservoirs <br />on each system were sampled in 1985. Few have been recaptured more than <br />a few weeks after introduction. Post-stocking studies to evaluate <br />dispersal and predation were carried out in 1984 and 1985. Fish 62-213 <br />mm TL move downstream•at night. Predation by introduced catfishes <br />(Pylodictis olivaris, Ictalurus punctatus) has potential to remove sig- <br />nificant percentages of stocked fish. It is recommended that razorback <br />be stocked at upstream localities where predator populations are absent <br />or small, in winter when predation may be reduced, or where predators <br />have been removed or at least depleted. Introductions should be of a <br />few individuals over a wide time span rather than abruptly in large <br />groups. Intensive monitoring should be restricted to a single river <br />system to better use limited resources and obtain better information on <br />successes and/or failures. Possibilities for differential survival of <br />raceway versus pond-reared fish and for training in predator avoidance <br />should be investigated. <br />Paul C. Marsh <br />Center for Environmental Studies and <br />Department of Zoology <br />Arizona State University <br />Tempe, Arizona 85287 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.