Laserfiche WebLink
22 JOURNAL OF THE ARIZONA-NEVADA ACADEMY OF SCIENCE VOL. 16 <br />Table 1. Mean number (N) and biomass (B) of food items in channel catfish from the Coachella Canal, California. <br /> <br /> <br />Food Item <br /> <br />N <br />A <br />B <br /> <br />N STATION <br />B <br />B N <br />C <br />B <br />A + B + C <br />N B <br />Insects <br />Baetis sp. 0.15 <0.01 0.40 <0.01 0.43 <0.01 0.18 <0.01 <br />Odonata 5.26 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.48 <0.01 4.42 0.13 <br />Smicridea utico 135.20 0.54 1.58 0.05 135.90 0.45 135.30 0.51 <br />Nectopsyche sp. 4.28 <0.01 0.20 <0.01 0.14 <0.01 3.56 <0.01 <br />Parargyractis confusalis 2.81 0.01 0.20 <0.01 0.62 <0.01 2.42 0.01 <br />Chironomidae 9.77 <0.01 0.20 <0.01 0.38 <0.01 8.14 <0.01 <br />Crayfish 0.06 0.008 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.007 <br />Fish 0.02 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 <br />Filamentous algae - 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.13 <br />Miscellaneous 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.38 <0.01 0.09 0.01 <br />Unidentified 0.008 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.006 <0.01 <br />Number of fish 125 5 21 151 <br />Mean TL (mm) 168 105 129 161 <br />Mean weight (gm) 52.79 13.20 18.16 46.66 <br />Biomass per stomach (gm) 1.16 0.06 0.46 0.82 <br /> <br />W y, <br />(7 U <br />Q Z <br />H W <br />Z Z) <br />wa <br />U <br />W W <br />W cc <br />W <br />EL <br />w <br />Qu <br />w2 <br />00 <br />_ <br />w m <br />a- <br />CA <br />= w <br />U¢ D <br />o <br />¢yo¢c w <br />LL <br />< oU) <br />Q c? o M Z u_ u, CC z <br />F-ZUF-QOY Qww <br />Ch <br />M: Q = <br />u1 0 - C) cc <br />C7 = <br />¢o?wQxocN_j <br />MOWZn.QQu-QO <br />Figure 1. Mean percentage frequency and wet weight <br />biomass of food items in channel catfish <br />stomachs (N = 151) from the Coachella <br />Canal, California. <br />99% frequency (Fig. 1), averaged 131 individuals per stoma <br />(Table 1), and contributed 62.2% of overall biomass (Fig. <br />One catfish (323 mm TL) contained 646 individu? ; <br />Frequency of occurrence of the caddisfly was similar for <br />size classes of fish (Fig. 3); however, at Station A tr <br />percentage contribution to biomass dropped from 80-925: <br />fish of 150-199 mm TL to 55-28% in fish of 200-299 mm <br />Mean individual weight of caddisflies was constant at 3-5 <br />The total of approximately 20,000 caddisflies observe <br />stomachs included only 13 pupae and no adults. <br />Chironomid midges (including larvae and a few pupae <br />adults) were in more than 70% of all stomachs, but due to <br />small size and low numbers contributed only a fraction :. <br />percentage of biomass. Occurrence was nearly 80% at St,: <br />A but only 33 and 20% at Stations B and C, respecti'r <br />Based on the sample from Station A, utilization was gre,- <br />by smaller catfish; 75-98% by fish of 150-199 mm <br />compared to about 507c by fish of 200-299 mm TL. A' <br />individual weights of chironomids were 1-3 mg. <br />Nearly all odonate larvae were damselflies of the ge:• <br />Hetaerina, although a very few gomphidae (dragonflies) w- <br />encountered. Overall occurrence was about 64% but diffe- <br />among sites: 75%, 0%, and 33% at Stations A, B, am. <br />respectively. Odonate contribution to total biomass <br />nearly 16%, due largely, to their importance at Statio-; <br />Utilization of these relatively large insects (mean indivi4 <br />weights of 10-46 mg) was 100% by fish of 200-299 mm TL <br />only 13% by fish of <100 mm TL; the relation between <br />size and occurrence was approximately linear between tt: <br />extremes (Fig. 3). Larger fish ate the largest odonates; nr . <br />individual weights of 10, 12, 38, and 46 mg were consume,; =_- <br />fish of mean lengths of 121, 169, 269, and 338 <br />respectively. These were the only insects which ci,1'--"_? <br />showed this relationship. <br />ISf <br />Fi <br />in <br />bi <br />i= <br />St <br />fig <br />T <br />al <br />W, <br />sI <br />B <br />m