Laserfiche WebLink
tality (which is likely density-inde- <br />pendent) may be responsible for the <br />variability in returns seen in Figure <br />7, but it is not the reason that the <br />population is declining. Without <br />considering the geomorphic effects <br />of the flood-control dams, the bio- <br />logical research program (no matter <br />how insightful) would not lead to <br />an appreciation of how the habitat <br />is becoming increasingly unsuitable <br />for salmon. <br />Case II: Channel incision and <br />reduced floodplain inundation <br />The Oconee River, as it flows <br />through the coastal plain of Geor- <br />gia, is a different type of lotic eco- <br />system-a sand-bedded, low-gradi- <br />ent, low-shear stress, highly sinuous, <br />meandering river with bottomland <br />hardwood swamps on its floodplain <br />(Figure 8). A hydroelectric dam was <br />built on the Oconee in the 1950s. <br />The river appears to support lower <br />densities of fish than do similar riv- <br />ers in the southeastern United States <br />(Evans 1994). <br />The floodplains of many rivers in <br />this region are inundated for signifi- <br />cant portions of the year, commonly <br />three or four months (Wharton et <br />al. 1982). These floodplains are <br />important to the ecology of many <br />fish species that spawn or rear within <br />them (Bain and Boltz 1989, Lambou <br />1990, Walker 1984). Also, because <br />sand-bedded rivers do not produce <br />large numbers of invertebrate prey <br />for fish, the inundated floodplains <br />serve as highly productive foraging <br />grounds for many species, such as <br />sunfish and black bass (Centrarc- <br />hidae), catfish (Ictaluridae), and <br />suckers (Catostomidae). The food <br />they obtain there may be quite im- <br />portant to their growth and fitness <br />(Welcomme 1989). The inundated <br />floodplains are also important to <br />many fish as a refuge from preda- <br />tion (Welcomme 1989). The reduc- <br />tion in the availability of this refuge <br />may lead to greatly reduced popula- <br />tion levels of some forage species, <br />which can in turn lead to population <br />declines of piscivorous fish (Power <br />et al. page 159 this issue). <br />As the reservoir on the Oconee is <br />small and has not attenuated the <br />natural peak flows, one might ex- <br />pect that the floodplain would con- <br />Table 1. Areas and perimeters of lower <br />McKenzie River islands and wetted sur- <br />face area for the years 1930 and 1990. <br />Year <br />Features 1930 1990 <br />Islands (number) 60 28 <br />Island area (m2) 2,260,000 1,110,000 <br />Island perimeter (m) 44,000 18,000 <br />Wetted area of <br />river (m2) 4,020,000 2,930,000 <br />tinue to be inundated much as it had <br />been in the past. However, as is <br />often the case below dams, the river <br />has lowered its bed and deepened its <br />channel (incised) perhaps as much <br />as 1 m, as a result of the dam captur- <br />ing most of the river's sediment. <br />Incision of 1 m in a river that al- <br />ready had vertical clay banks 5-7 m <br />high is not easy to detect. <br />The river does not look or behave <br />like an entrenched river. For ex- <br />ample, lateral migration of the <br />stream channel continues at a nor- <br />mal rate (2-5% of channel width <br />per year). We have drawn this con- <br />clusion because we observed a coars- <br />ening of the surface layer of in-chan- <br />nel sediment deposits (armoring) and <br />the presence of terraces on tributar- <br />ies near their confluence with the <br />Oconee, indicating that the tribu- <br />taries have cut down in response to <br />the new lower level of the Oconee. <br />Armoring and tributary incision are <br />common responses to river incision <br />(Parker 1980). We are in the process <br />of modeling the sediment transport <br />in the Oconee River to better esti- <br />mate the extent and magnitude of <br />down-cutting that has occurred since <br />the dam was built. <br />The new, deeper channel requires <br />a higher discharge to overtop its <br />banks and spill out onto the flood- <br />plain. Preliminary estimates indicate <br />that the floodplain is inundated for <br />far less time than before, even though <br />the high flows have not been altered <br />by dam operations. A reduction in <br />the areal extent and duration of <br />floodplain inundation can often re- <br />sult in decreased species diversity <br />and standing crop of fish (Finger <br />and Stewart 1987, Pollard et al. <br />1983, Welcomme and Hagborg <br />1977, Wharton et al. 1982, Zalumi <br />1970) and is likely contributing to <br />the apparently low population den- <br />sities and catch rates of fish in the <br />Oconee. <br />As with the McKenzie, there has <br />been considerable biological re- <br />search on the Oconee into such top- <br />ics as the minimal flow requirements <br />of various fishes and guilds of fish <br />species and the effects of flow fluc- <br />tuations on fish displacement. We <br />believe, however, the overriding <br />problem has been the geomorphic <br />adjustment of the river to the new <br />conditions imposed by the dam. <br />Case III: Increased stability of <br />a braided river <br />Our final example is from our work <br />on salmon ecology in New Zealand's <br />South Island, which is famous for its <br />large braided rivers (Figure 9). Chi- <br />nook salmon, which were introduced <br />from North America in the early <br />1900s, are one of the primary spe- <br />cies of concern in these rivers. De- <br />spite the extensive gravel visible in <br />Figure 9, little salmon-spawning <br />habitat is available, because these <br />rivers are highly unstable, flood fre- <br />quently, and have constantly shift- <br />ing channels. <br />Succesful spawning occurs pri- <br />marily in small spring-fed tributar- <br />ies to these streams. Rearing habitat <br />for recently hatched salmon (known <br />as fry) is limited in these tributaries, <br />and fry that rear in the main channel <br />may be swept downstream by flood- <br />ing flows. As these braided rivers <br />typically have extremely small estu- <br />aries, fry may be displaced directly <br />into the ocean, where they may die <br />as a result of premature exposure to <br />high salinity levels or predation. <br />The Waitaki River is the only <br />large braided river in New Zealand <br />that is dammed. The salmon are <br />restricted to the lower Waitaki River, <br />below the most-downstream reser- <br />voir, Lake Waitaki. Because flood <br />run-off in the Waitaki is stored to <br />produce electricity later in the year, <br />peak flows in the lower Waitaki are <br />reduced. As a result, the riverbed <br />does not shift and move nearly as <br />often as it did prior to construction <br />of the dam. The increased stability <br />of the bars has allowed vegetation <br />(e.g., willows [Salix spp.] and lu- <br />pines [Lupinus spp.]) to become es- <br />tablished on the bars, further stabi- <br />lizing the locations of existing <br />March 1995 187