tality (which is likely density-inde-
<br />pendent) may be responsible for the
<br />variability in returns seen in Figure
<br />7, but it is not the reason that the
<br />population is declining. Without
<br />considering the geomorphic effects
<br />of the flood-control dams, the bio-
<br />logical research program (no matter
<br />how insightful) would not lead to
<br />an appreciation of how the habitat
<br />is becoming increasingly unsuitable
<br />for salmon.
<br />Case II: Channel incision and
<br />reduced floodplain inundation
<br />The Oconee River, as it flows
<br />through the coastal plain of Geor-
<br />gia, is a different type of lotic eco-
<br />system-a sand-bedded, low-gradi-
<br />ent, low-shear stress, highly sinuous,
<br />meandering river with bottomland
<br />hardwood swamps on its floodplain
<br />(Figure 8). A hydroelectric dam was
<br />built on the Oconee in the 1950s.
<br />The river appears to support lower
<br />densities of fish than do similar riv-
<br />ers in the southeastern United States
<br />(Evans 1994).
<br />The floodplains of many rivers in
<br />this region are inundated for signifi-
<br />cant portions of the year, commonly
<br />three or four months (Wharton et
<br />al. 1982). These floodplains are
<br />important to the ecology of many
<br />fish species that spawn or rear within
<br />them (Bain and Boltz 1989, Lambou
<br />1990, Walker 1984). Also, because
<br />sand-bedded rivers do not produce
<br />large numbers of invertebrate prey
<br />for fish, the inundated floodplains
<br />serve as highly productive foraging
<br />grounds for many species, such as
<br />sunfish and black bass (Centrarc-
<br />hidae), catfish (Ictaluridae), and
<br />suckers (Catostomidae). The food
<br />they obtain there may be quite im-
<br />portant to their growth and fitness
<br />(Welcomme 1989). The inundated
<br />floodplains are also important to
<br />many fish as a refuge from preda-
<br />tion (Welcomme 1989). The reduc-
<br />tion in the availability of this refuge
<br />may lead to greatly reduced popula-
<br />tion levels of some forage species,
<br />which can in turn lead to population
<br />declines of piscivorous fish (Power
<br />et al. page 159 this issue).
<br />As the reservoir on the Oconee is
<br />small and has not attenuated the
<br />natural peak flows, one might ex-
<br />pect that the floodplain would con-
<br />Table 1. Areas and perimeters of lower
<br />McKenzie River islands and wetted sur-
<br />face area for the years 1930 and 1990.
<br />Year
<br />Features 1930 1990
<br />Islands (number) 60 28
<br />Island area (m2) 2,260,000 1,110,000
<br />Island perimeter (m) 44,000 18,000
<br />Wetted area of
<br />river (m2) 4,020,000 2,930,000
<br />tinue to be inundated much as it had
<br />been in the past. However, as is
<br />often the case below dams, the river
<br />has lowered its bed and deepened its
<br />channel (incised) perhaps as much
<br />as 1 m, as a result of the dam captur-
<br />ing most of the river's sediment.
<br />Incision of 1 m in a river that al-
<br />ready had vertical clay banks 5-7 m
<br />high is not easy to detect.
<br />The river does not look or behave
<br />like an entrenched river. For ex-
<br />ample, lateral migration of the
<br />stream channel continues at a nor-
<br />mal rate (2-5% of channel width
<br />per year). We have drawn this con-
<br />clusion because we observed a coars-
<br />ening of the surface layer of in-chan-
<br />nel sediment deposits (armoring) and
<br />the presence of terraces on tributar-
<br />ies near their confluence with the
<br />Oconee, indicating that the tribu-
<br />taries have cut down in response to
<br />the new lower level of the Oconee.
<br />Armoring and tributary incision are
<br />common responses to river incision
<br />(Parker 1980). We are in the process
<br />of modeling the sediment transport
<br />in the Oconee River to better esti-
<br />mate the extent and magnitude of
<br />down-cutting that has occurred since
<br />the dam was built.
<br />The new, deeper channel requires
<br />a higher discharge to overtop its
<br />banks and spill out onto the flood-
<br />plain. Preliminary estimates indicate
<br />that the floodplain is inundated for
<br />far less time than before, even though
<br />the high flows have not been altered
<br />by dam operations. A reduction in
<br />the areal extent and duration of
<br />floodplain inundation can often re-
<br />sult in decreased species diversity
<br />and standing crop of fish (Finger
<br />and Stewart 1987, Pollard et al.
<br />1983, Welcomme and Hagborg
<br />1977, Wharton et al. 1982, Zalumi
<br />1970) and is likely contributing to
<br />the apparently low population den-
<br />sities and catch rates of fish in the
<br />Oconee.
<br />As with the McKenzie, there has
<br />been considerable biological re-
<br />search on the Oconee into such top-
<br />ics as the minimal flow requirements
<br />of various fishes and guilds of fish
<br />species and the effects of flow fluc-
<br />tuations on fish displacement. We
<br />believe, however, the overriding
<br />problem has been the geomorphic
<br />adjustment of the river to the new
<br />conditions imposed by the dam.
<br />Case III: Increased stability of
<br />a braided river
<br />Our final example is from our work
<br />on salmon ecology in New Zealand's
<br />South Island, which is famous for its
<br />large braided rivers (Figure 9). Chi-
<br />nook salmon, which were introduced
<br />from North America in the early
<br />1900s, are one of the primary spe-
<br />cies of concern in these rivers. De-
<br />spite the extensive gravel visible in
<br />Figure 9, little salmon-spawning
<br />habitat is available, because these
<br />rivers are highly unstable, flood fre-
<br />quently, and have constantly shift-
<br />ing channels.
<br />Succesful spawning occurs pri-
<br />marily in small spring-fed tributar-
<br />ies to these streams. Rearing habitat
<br />for recently hatched salmon (known
<br />as fry) is limited in these tributaries,
<br />and fry that rear in the main channel
<br />may be swept downstream by flood-
<br />ing flows. As these braided rivers
<br />typically have extremely small estu-
<br />aries, fry may be displaced directly
<br />into the ocean, where they may die
<br />as a result of premature exposure to
<br />high salinity levels or predation.
<br />The Waitaki River is the only
<br />large braided river in New Zealand
<br />that is dammed. The salmon are
<br />restricted to the lower Waitaki River,
<br />below the most-downstream reser-
<br />voir, Lake Waitaki. Because flood
<br />run-off in the Waitaki is stored to
<br />produce electricity later in the year,
<br />peak flows in the lower Waitaki are
<br />reduced. As a result, the riverbed
<br />does not shift and move nearly as
<br />often as it did prior to construction
<br />of the dam. The increased stability
<br />of the bars has allowed vegetation
<br />(e.g., willows [Salix spp.] and lu-
<br />pines [Lupinus spp.]) to become es-
<br />tablished on the bars, further stabi-
<br />lizing the locations of existing
<br />March 1995 187
|