My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7928
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7928
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:46 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:21:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7928
Author
Lamb, B. L., N. Burkardt and J. G. Taylor
Title
The Importance Of Defining Technical Issues In Inter-Agency Environmental Negotiations
USFW Year
n.d.
USFW - Doc Type
13
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Table 1: Interview Questions Used to Measure <br />the Clarity of Technical Issues <br />PRELICENSE PHASE OF CONSULTATION <br />1. At this phase, did the parties involved agree to the definition of the problem? For example: the geographic extent, range of flows to <br />be considered, important species and life stages, or recreation and other water uses to be included. <br />2. Did oou- agree with the definition of these problems? <br />If No: If not, then when? [Identify phase] <br />3. At what point were the studies clearly defined? <br />4. Once established, was that understanding ever lost? Did it fluctuate or remain constant? <br />5. For this phase, please rate the technical issues on a scale where 1 = completely obscure to 10 = completely clear? <br />POST-LICENSE PHASE <br />6. Did technical issues change during this phase? If yes: Were new technical issues introduced or did the definition of existing issues <br />change? Did ou agree to these changes? <br />7. How clear was the definition of technical issues, from 1 = totally obscure to 10 = completely clear? <br />Table 2: Interview Questions Used to Measure <br />a Successful Negotiation <br />1. Do you feel a satisfactory agreement was negotiated by the parties in the consultation process? Was anything important left out of <br />this agreement? Did you ever have to renegotiate a point after everyone had agreed to it? If yes: What was happening then? <br />2. Did the license/application agreement include Procedures to implement the project and mitigation actions agreed to? <br />-with authorities/responsibilities identified? <br />-with agreed upon timing? <br />3. Did everyone agree to have the project operation monitored? If yes: Who was responsible for the monitoring? What kind of <br />monitoring was agreed to? <br />4. Has this monitoring actually taken place? <br />5a. How will the relationships you developed with the other parties in these consultations affect how you proceed in future <br />negotiations? OR <br />5b. Would you go back to the negotiation table with these same parties again? What would be your incentive? <br />6. Rate die negotiated agreement on this scale: 1 = a complete failure to 10 = a complete success.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.