My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7206
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7206
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:45 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:21:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7206
Author
Lanigan, S. H. and H. M. Tyus
Title
Population Size and Status of the Razorback Sucker in the Green River Basin, Utah and Colorado
USFW Year
1989
USFW - Doc Type
North American Journal of Fisheries Management
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
70 <br />LANIGAN AND TYUS <br />40 <br />20 <br />0 <br />20 <br />0 <br />20 <br />0 <br />U <br />Z 20 <br />w <br />m 0 <br />w <br />? 20 <br />E- <br />Z o <br />w <br />U 20 <br />tY <br />w <br />CL o <br />20 <br />0 <br />20 <br />0 <br />20 <br />0 <br />1988 <br />n-60 <br />1987 <br />n-62 <br />1986 <br />n-79 <br />1985 <br />n-19 <br />1984 <br />n-86 <br />1983 <br />n-3 <br />1982 <br />n-34 <br />1981 <br />n-66 <br />1980 <br />n-18 <br />42 44 46 48 60 52 64 66 58 60 62 <br />TOTAL LENGTH (cm) <br />FIGURE 2.-Size-classes of razorback sucker caught in the Green River basin, 1980-1988. <br />only 1.8 and 33%, respectively, of the catches of <br />the federally endangered Colorado squawfish. <br />Population estimates are meaningful only if <br />population characteristics meet the assumptions <br />of geographic and demographic closure; i.e., the <br />population is confined to a discrete area, and re- <br />cruitment and mortality do not occur during the <br />experiment (White et al. 1982). Population esti- <br />mation in a large geographic area, over a long time <br />period, is normally ill-advised because the as- <br />sumptions of closure are usually violated. How- <br />ever, we believe the unique distribution and life <br />history of the razorback sucker in the Green River <br />basin meets the closure requirement and that our <br />population estimate is valid. Our reasoning fol- <br />lows. <br />A review of available data indicated no razor- <br />back sucker movement occurred between the up- <br />per and lower portions of the Green River, nor <br />between the lower Green and Colorado rivers. <br />Substantial rapids in Gray and lower Desolation <br />canyons (km 211-282) appear to form a barrier <br />between the upper and lower Green River, and a <br />diversion dam at km 206 presents a further barrier <br />to fish movement. The confluence of the Green <br />River with the Colorado River forms the lower <br />boundary of the lower Green River; no razorback <br />suckers tagged in the Green River were later caught <br />in the Colorado River. Only one individual (col- <br />lected at km 29 of the White River in 1987) was <br />found more than 2.4 km upstream of the mouth <br />of tributaries entering the Green River (electro-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.