My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7128 (2)
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7128 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:44 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:20:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7128
Author
Barham, W. T., H. J. Schoonbee and J. G. J. Visser
Title
Some Observations on the Narcotizing Ability of Electric Currents on the Common Carp
USFW Year
1989
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
National Water Summary 1987-Water Supply and Use: INSTREAM WATER USE 111 <br />Table 16. Programs providing an appropriative water right in selected Western States as of 1987 <br />[This is a partial listing; all States west of the Mississippi River, except New Mexico, have some sort of instream-flow program <br />Sources: As indicated by footnotes] <br />State Program purpose(s) Scope Approach Instream-right holders <br />Alaska'.......... Fish and wildlife; Statewide.... Stream-by-stream...... Any public or private <br /> recreation; water entity. <br /> quality; navigation. <br />Arizona.......... Fish and wildlife; .....do........ By stream segment... Do. <br /> recreation. <br />California........ Fish and wildlife; wild .....do........ Stream-by-stream; Conditions on new water <br /> and scenic river; review of each rights. <br /> public trust. diversionary water <br /> right. <br />Idaho'............ Fish and wildlife; .....do........ Stream-by-stream...... Idaho Water Resources <br /> recreation; visual Board. <br /> quality; water quality; <br /> navigation. <br />Montana'........ Fish and wildlife; .....do........ Basin-wide planning... Any political subdivision <br /> recreation; water of the State. <br /> quality; future con- <br /> sumptive uses. <br />Nevada........... Fish and wildlife; .....do........ By stream segment... Any public or private <br /> recreation; water entity. <br /> quality. <br />Oregon. .......... .....do....................... .....do........ Basin-wide planning... Departments of Fish and <br /> Wildlife and Environ- <br /> mental Quality. <br />Utah' .............. Fish and wildlife.......... Limited....... Stream-by-stream...... State Division of Wildlife <br /> Resources. <br />Washington'.... Fish and wildlife; Statewide.... Basin-wide planning... State Department of <br /> recreation; visual Ecology. <br /> quality; water quality; <br /> navigation. <br />Wyoming'....... Fish and wildlife.......... Limited....... Stream-by-stream...... State of Wyoming. <br />'McKinney and Taylor (1988). 2Shupe, 1988. <br />Table 17. Programs providing for instream flows in selected Eastern States as of 1987 <br />[This is a partial listing; most Eastern States have some sort of statutory provision that could be used to protect streamflows. Source: <br />Lamb, 19861 <br />State Program purpose(s) Scope Approach Type of protection <br />Iowa ............... Natural environment.... Statewide....... Stream-by-stream..... Administrative rule. <br />Maine ............. River resources........... 16 streams...... Important streams.... Governor's executive <br /> order. <br />Michigan......... Natural rivers; natural Statewide....... Stream-by-stream..... State and local admin- <br /> environment. istrative rules. <br />Minnesota....... Natural environment.... .....do ............ .....do.................... Administrative rule. <br />Pennsylvania.... Fish habitat ................ Hydroelectric .....do.................... Do. <br /> projects. <br />Wisconsin....... Natural environment; Statewide....... .....do .................... Do. <br /> navigation.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.