Laserfiche WebLink
„o zs , .,e -,- 1-11111111 ??ar aiarr?e vrtl. 30, it(, 1W. <br />"'.• o---o AllOpatriC A <br />-Sympatric <br />20 <br />= 0 <br />v? <br />0 t9 <br />LL 1 <br />ce / '? to <br />in t0 0 <br />Z • <br /> <br />13 24 <br />D AY S <br />FIG. 2.-Results of field coexistence study. Plotted is individual population sizes of I- <br />occidentalis versus link for populations allopatric to, and sympatric with, G. affinis. t.im, <br />connect population means, <br />Fin Damage Analysis.-In the native population at Bylas Springs, 122 of <br />178 (68.5%a) topminnows examined from October 1980 to March 1982 had <br />slight to heavy caudal fin damage. Forty-two topminnows collected in 1968. <br />before mosquitofish colonization, had no damage. Over 100 topminnotss <br />examined between March and July, 1981 from an adjacent spring lackin4 <br />mosquitofish exhibited <1% fin damage. <br />Similar damage appeared on laboratory topminnows coexisting wide <br />mosquitofish. After 52 days in aquaria, 73 of 130 (56.2%) topminnows held <br />with G, affinis had damaged fins, while none of 144 held in allopatry was <br />damaged. There was also a slight, but significant decrease in mean survival <br />of populations of 12 topminnows adults when in sympatry (allopatric <br />= 11.92, SD = 0.29; sympatric: X = 10.92, SD = 0.90; t = 3.664, P = <br />.0029). When the species were placed together, mosquitofish femaics <br />immediately became aggressive, and chased and bit topminnows. Within F) <br />minutes some fish were damaged; most were attacked within an hour. <br />Mosquitofish did not generally act aggressively toward one another, and no <br />fin damage was observed on that species. <br />Stress Analysis.-Topminnows sympatric with mosquitofish in the first <br />laboratory stress experiment were significantly lighter in somatic weight. <br />and produced fewer embryos and mature ova, than did allopauit <br />individuals (Fig. 3, Table 1). In the second trial, significant difference. <br />appeared in ovary weight and fertility (Fig. 4, Table 1). There was nn <br />detectable effect of sympatry versus allopatry on total weight or ovar} <br />weight in the field (Fig. 5, Table 1) and trends (regression slopes) were in <br />the opposite direction of laboratory results. There was a significant <br />difference in fertility between allopatric and sympatric field populations. <br />but again in the opposite direction of that seen in the laboratory. <br />B <br />O. <br />0 <br />01-W <br />} 20 n <br />J 15 <br />F- ? <br />w o <br />LL 10 p <br />AD o <br />, • <br />'o <br />6 ?i • <br />• <br />26 28 30 32 34 36 <br />STANDARD LENGTH (m m) <br />FIG. 3.-Results of laboratory stress analysis 1. A) Plotted is wet body weight (upper regressions) <br />,lid wet ovary weight (lower regressions) versus standard length [or allopatric <br />I). - -0) and sympaui( (• 0) Sonoran topminnow p(pulations. 13) Plotted is fertility versus <br />,undard length for allopatric (0- - -0) and sympatric (• -) Sonoran topminnow populations. <br />DiscuSSION.-Available data suggest that replacement of Y. occidentalis by <br />G. affinis is primarily due to predation on juveniles, with stress responses <br />to adults potentially playing a minor role. Other hypotheses, such as <br />resource competition, hybridization, parasitism, or disease, are rejected for <br />lack of supportive evidence. <br />Predation on topminnows by mosquitofish was repeatedly observed in the <br />himratory and the field. In both experimental settings, the native species <br />did not recruit successfully when in sympatry with mosquitofish. A possible <br />stress response, expressed as lighter, less-fecund female topminnows, was <br />inconsistently observed in laboratory experiments. Since similar results <br />0/ <br />/ <br />/o <br />/ o <br />/ <br />/ <br />• <br />/ <br />/ <br />26 28 30 32 34 36