My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7311
CWCB
>
UCREFRP
>
Copyright
>
7311
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 5:01:45 PM
Creation date
5/22/2009 6:20:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
UCREFRP
UCREFRP Catalog Number
7311
Author
McCarthy, M. S. and W. L. Minckley
Title
Age Estimation for Razorback Sucker (Pisces
USFW Year
1987
USFW - Doc Type
Catostomidae) from Lake Mohave, Arizona and Nevada
Copyright Material
YES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IOURNAL OF THE ARIZONA-NEVADA ACADEMY OF SCIENCE VOL. 21 <br />Table 2. Size variation in razorback sucker hatched in <br />February of various years at DNFH. Different data for <br />combined sexes in 1981 reflect variation in 2 separate <br />ponds. Limits of SL in mm; means t one standard error <br />in parentheses. <br />Year Class Month Sex n SL <br />of life <br />1981 7 combined 50 95-139 <br /> (113±1) <br />1981 7 combined 50 76-125 <br /> (91 ± 1) <br />1981 28 male 15 251-341 <br /> (306 ± 91 <br />1981 28 female 36 263-357 <br /> (316-4-4) <br />1982 7 combined 50 74-121 <br /> (95 ± 2) <br />1982 15 combined 50 129-226 <br /> (186±6) <br />[n = 81 and 298:t 10 mm SL [161). This pattern could <br />indicate growth enhancement by lentic conditions. The <br />species has a protrusible, almost-terminal mouth and <br />closely-spaced, "fuzzy" gill rakers indicating facultative <br />planktivory (Hubbs and Miller 1953). Adults in Lake <br />Mohave feed mostly on zooplankton (Marsh 1987). Rapid <br />growth in a filling reservoir could reflect response to <br />increased availability of planktonic foods. The species may <br />well be more adapted for feeding in backwater and oxbow <br />habitats of the unmodified Colorado River than for the river <br />channel. <br />Maximum natural longevity of razorback sucker is <br />unknown. The largest specimens from Lake Mohave have <br />been an unweighed female 57.6 cm SL (73.6 cm TL) and an <br />unmeasured 4.99 kg female (Minckley 1983; unpubl. data). <br />Individual weights of 12 to 14, and occasionally 16 pounds <br />(5.45, 6.35, and 7.26 kg, respectively) were reported on the <br />basis of local testimony by Hubbs and Miller (1953) from <br />Saguaro Lake, central Arizona. Miller (1955) reported <br />lengths "over 30 inches long" (ca. 60 cm SL) on the basis <br />of the same testimony. Actual specimens were not seen, <br />so these records are suspect (R. R. Miller, University of <br />Michigan Museum of Zoology, pers. comm.). Lengths and <br />weights of largest fish represented in archaeological remains <br />in Catclaw Cave, Arizona, were estimated at "2-3 feet (ca. <br />48-72 cm SL] and 10-12 pounds [4.54-5.45 kg]" on the basis <br />of proportional sizes of bones (Miller 1955). This site, now <br />inundated by Lake Mohave, was about 24 km downstream <br />from Hoover Dam. A vertebra from Quiburi, an 18th <br />Century Indian site on the San Pedro River, Arizona, was <br />from a razorback sucker "perhaps nearly 3 feet long [ca. 72 <br />cm SL]" (Miller 1955). <br />0 <br />a <br />0 <br />H <br />W <br />Q <br />Q <br />z <br />w <br />u <br />w <br />a <br />Figure 7. Percentage of growth to SL at capture achieved <br />by male (above) and female (below) razorback sucker caught <br />from Lake Mohave, Arizona and Nevada, at various, back- <br />calculated ages. Horizontal lines are means, boxes indicate <br />t one standard error of the mean, and vertical lines con- <br />nect limits. <br />Minckley (1983) documented a pattern of disappearance <br />of razorback sucker from Colorado River basin reservoirs <br />40 to 50 years after initial impoundment, and predicted the <br />same for Lake Mohave. Our data corroborate his conten- <br />tion that no detectable recruitment has occurred in Lake <br />Mohave since 1958, and little since 1954. Unless this trend <br />is reversed, population extirpation may be expected before <br />the year 2000. <br />ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS <br />This paper was revised from a thesis submitted by <br />McCarthy in partial fulfillment of requirements for a Master <br />of Science in Zoology at ASU. Research was supported in <br />part by ASU and U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), <br />Office of Endangered Species, Albuquerque, New Mexico. <br />We thank personnel of WBNFH, DNFH, AZGFD, and <br />CADFG for providing specimens. Numerous others assisted <br />in specimen acquisition and preparation, and we acknow- <br />ledge them all. Comments of Drs. f. E. Deacon (University <br />of Nevada, Las Vegasj, P. C. Marsh (ASU), B. D. Taubert <br />(AZGFD), and H. M. Tyus (USFWS) improved the manu- <br />script. <br />YEARS OF LIFE
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.